Saturday 30 November 2013

Skip insurance if dealer has ace in blackjack

From the perspective of those of us on the outside of the table felt, there's nothing more dreaded in blackjack than a dealer with an ace showing. About 30 percent of the time, the scenario results in dealer blackjack. In other words, it's bad news.

Most casinos around Northern California offer two basic options for players in this scenario. The first applies to all players at the table: the opportunity to "insure" your hand against a dealer blackjack. The second applies only to players who have received blackjack themselves: the option to take "even money," or a 1:1 payout, instead of what the table normally pays for 21. Both of these moves are a waste of time and money.

Let's start with "insurance." In the name of the Geico gecko, this wager really isn't "insurance" at all; instead it's a side bet that allows you to wager half your ante that the dealer has blackjack. If he does, you win at 2:1 odds. If he doesn't, you lose the insurance bet.

Considering the frequency with which dealers showing aces score blackjack, this might seem like a shrewd move. True odds suggest otherwise, and they differ depending on how many 10s you have in your hand. In fact, 19s and 20s, which novice players perceive to be the best hands to insure, offer some of the worst odds of all.

(Without dropping too many numbers on you, in order to justify insuring a 20 with a $10 bet, you'd need to get paid $25 to make the move worthwhile.)

If you think this is akin to throwing away cash, accepting "even money" when you have blackjack (and the dealer has an ace showing) is even worse. Normally, player blackjacks pay 3:2 or 6:5, depending on the table and the casino. But by accepting even money to avoid a push, you're hedging your bets into a payout of 1:1.

Let's get real: Taking even money against a dealer ace guarantees you some profit in a situation where there is relative likelihood you'll push. Still, that guaranteed profit comes at a price, and at a 3:2 table, the price is roughly one-third of the money you should get paid. Put differently: Wouldn't you rather win $15 on a $10 bet, instead of just settling for $10?

The only time accepting even money might be wise is if you're counting cards and you have strong reason to believe that more than one-third of the cards left in the deck or shoe are 10s.

My personal take: Steer clear of both options under almost all circumstances. Unless a payout matches true odds, don't bother with it at all. Yes, this strategy results in pushing (and therefore not winning) with a blackjack every once in a while. In the long run, however, as the numbers show, this is the play that will make you more cash.

Matt Villano is a freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Graton Resort & Casino: Rohnert Park facility opening

Bounded by patches of farmland a half mile from Highway 101, the gleaming Graton Resort & Casino is bringing a slice of Las Vegas, with some Northern California touches, to the North Bay.

Just days from opening, workers were putting the finishing touches on the mammoth casino: polishing the columns of Zebrano marble, checking to make sure the 3,000 slot machines are working, cleaning the glass of the skylight above the airy Sky Bar at the center of the gaming floor. The Rohnert Park casino opens Tuesday.

In some ways the Graton Casino is a departure from what you find in Vegas: It's not disorienting, and natural light filters in from the ceiling and doorways.

"We want people to be able to comfortably navigate the casino," said general manager Joe Hasson. "We don't want them lost inside the venue." The Graton Rancheria tribe's goal is to make the casino "contemporary, sophisticated and casual," he said, and to bring in "the natural beauty of Sonoma County."

In one way the casino will be too much like Vegas for many visitors: Smoking will be allowed on most of the gaming floor. Some areas, such as the poker room and all restaurants, will be nonsmoking. And some gaming tables will be nonsmoking as well. Lori Nelson, a spokeswoman for Station Casinos, which has contracted with the Graton tribe to build and manage the casino, said ventilation systems will refresh the casino with outdoor air and keep smoke from migrating into restaurant areas.

The dining and beverage options reflect the eclectic tastes of the region. Choices range from an upscale steak house called 630 Park to Martin Yan's M.Y. China. Chef Douglas Keane, a recent winner on "Top Chef Masters," will be serving fried chicken at DK Wings. For those on a budget there's the Habit grill with burgers starting at $3.45. Visitors will recognize local brands, such as Three Twins ice cream and Lagunitas beer, both made in Petaluma. And Sonoma and Napa wines will be featured at the bars.

There's also an area where big spenders can gamble in private. "It's a double-gated community," Hasson said.

He says he sees Graton as a destination not just for gamblers but for anyone looking for a night of entertainment. He said 7 million people visit Sonoma County annually, "and we want to give them a reason to stay an extra day."

It's been a long road for the casino: The tribe overcame local opposition and legal challenges, spent more than $800 million and hired more than 2,200 workers. The buzz is building. Now it's showtime.

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Oddsmakers like Alabama's chances

As the college football season hits the homestretch, the number of title contenders gets whittled down: Alabama remains the favorite to take the title and Stanford, after losing Saturday for the second time this year, is off the board.

"They (the Cardinal) are out of it now," said John Avello, director of race and sports operations at Wynn Las Vegas.

But much intrigue remains. Alabama has a relatively tough test on Nov. 30 against Auburn, and if the Crimson Tide lose, that could open the way for Ohio State or Baylor to take on Florida State in the title game.

At press time Wynn had Alabama's odds to win the title at 2:3 (meaning you'd have to bet $30 to win $20). Florida State is 8:5, Ohio State is 7:1 and Oregon (which lost once, to Stanford) is 15:1. Oregon "still has an outside shot," Avello said, "but they need some help."

If Alabama and Florida State remain undefeated, they'll almost certainly face one another in the BCS Championship Game on Jan. 6. Avello said he expects Alabama would be favored by about 4 points.

The odds at MGM are slightly different: Alabama is the favorite at 5:6, Florida State is 6:5 and Baylor is 7:2, said Jay Rood, MGM's vice president of race and sports. The longer shots are Ohio State at 9:2, Oregon at 5:1 and Auburn at 6:1.

"Baylor has the best chance to break up (the expected matchup between Alabama and Florida State)," Rood said.

Setting odds for the NCAA title game can be challenging because, unlike in pro sports, top teams can be determined by computer rankings. "Something weird always happens," Rood said.

Next season, the NCAA is inaugurating a four-team playoff, giving more teams a shot to play for the title. "Those games will be outstanding from a bookmaking point of view," Rood said, expecting tremendous interest.

Though Stanford is almost surely out of BCS title contention, the Cardinal are heavy favorites in the Big Game on Saturday against Cal, which has had an abysmal season under new coach Sonny Dykes. At Wynn, Stanford is favored by 32 points.

How about the Heisman Trophy? Nevada casinos can't take bets on propositions that aren't determined on the field, but online betting sites can. Bovada.lv has Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston as the overwhelming favorite at 4:11 (meaning you'd have to bet $110 to win $40).

Next is Texas A&M signal caller, and 2012 Heisman winner, Johnny Manziel at 5:2; Alabama quarterback A.J. McCarron is 13:2; and Baylor QB Bryce Petty rounds out the top four Heisman contenders at 10:1.

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Sports betting: Timing essential to great odds

Way back in March, when a high school buddy of mine threw down some money on the Pittsburgh Pirates to win the National League pennant in the major-league baseball playoffs, the rest of us laughed in his face. We were in Vegas at the time to bet on college basketball, and there was this dude, going all national pastime on us.

"Yo," the friend said, "look at the odds." He shoved the ticket in our faces. Then the number stared out at us: 40/1.

In the moment, the wager suddenly seemed like genius. We all started fantasizing about how one lightning-in-a-bottle type season could turn $20 into $800 overnight. Fast forward seven months, and the bet seems even smarter: The Pirates won the NL wild card and played the St. Louis Cardinals to the wire for the right to advance to the NLCS. (At press time, it was unclear who would win the series.) The lesson: Sometimes, it really pays to embrace big odds and gamble on a long shot.

(You can't legally bet on sports in California. You can, however, head into Nevada and bet in a sports book there. You also can place these kinds of wagers at a variety of websites based outside of the United States.)

In the past 10 days, there have been a number of examples of epic sports bets:

-- Earlier this month, Ohio State eked out a cover on the final play of a game against Northwestern, costing Vegas sports books an estimated $100 million in the process. (Roughly 80 percent of the money on the game was for OSU to cover.)

-- Last weekend, a bettor in Vegas put down $282 on a (mostly money-line) 18-team parlay that spanned sports and leagues. Some of the contests were blowouts. Some were nail-biters. One of the 18 games was on the University of Toledo to win outright. When every single one of this guy's picks hit, he turned his $282 investment into more than $54,000. Dan Shapiro of Gambling911.com says the chances of such a parlay hitting are 0.00000381469 percent, meaning the guy literally had a better chance of getting struck by lightning.

-- This weekend, sports bettors are in for another piece of history: The opening 28-point spread in Sunday's Denver Broncos/Jacksonville Jaguars game was the largest spread in NFL history. With Peyton Manning having an MVP-type season and going up against the worst team in the league, the Broncos likely will do it. Consider this free betting advice.

Matt Villano is a freelance writer in Healdsburg. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Betting on the NFL: 49ers among title favorites

The National Football League season opens Thursday, with defending Super Bowl champion Baltimore taking on this year's favorite, the Denver Broncos. With elite quarterback Peyton Manning at the helm, the Broncos at press time were 7:2 to win the Super Bowl this year.

The team with the next best odds? The 49ers, who came within 5 yards of a thrilling comeback win in Super Bowl XLVII in February.

And this may surprise you - San Francisco's division rivals, the Seattle Seahawks, are also 5:1. The Seahawks opened in January at 10:1 at MGM Resorts and have dropped to 5:1, showing bettors like their chances.

All three teams - Denver, the 49ers and Seattle - had strong campaigns but "disappointing ends to their seasons, and people expect them to build on that and springboard into the regular season," said Jay Rood, MGM's vice president of race and sports. Bettors believe these teams will "put a better end to their story this season."

Rood says Sunday's matchup between the 49ers and the Green Bay Packers "could be the most critical Week 1 game" and be "very telling as far as the playoffs." If San Francisco loses at home, "it could come back to haunt them come playoff time."

San Francisco opened as a 4.5-point favorite for Sunday's game, but more money has been bet on Green Bay, so the spread moved down to 4 points at press time.

The Raiders aren't in the conversation for a Super Bowl title - they opened at 50:1 and MGM's odds have risen to 100:1. Oakland opens on the road against the Indianapolis Colts, who went 11-5 last year under rookie quarterback Andrew Luck after winning just two games the season before.

The Raiders opened as 7-point underdogs; by press time the spread was 10 points.

There's a lesson here: If you're in Nevada or anywhere else where sports betting is legal - it's not in California - bet quickly if you feel strongly about a game and think you'll be ahead of the crowd. If you want to bet against the Raiders, it'd be much better to give 7 points than 8.5 or 10.

Of course no bet is a sure thing. "It's still the NFL - even the worst teams usually win three or four games and stay competitive in most games," Rood said.

And how about Kansas City, which could be a team on the rise with former 49er Alex Smith at quarterback? The Chiefs open on the road (at Jacksonville), but are favored. At 50:1 the Chiefs are not likely Super Bowl contenders, "but they could really click," Rood said. "They could be this year's Indianapolis Colts."

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Odds say NBA's Warriors decent pick to win it all

It's been "a long time" since the Golden State Warriors were predicted to win more than 50 games, says Nick Bogdanovich, director of trading for William Hill. But this year the over/under on the Warriors is 51.5 games, meaning that if you bet the over and the Warriors win 52 or more of their 82 regular-season games, you win.

If they stay healthy and new addition Andre Iguodala plays to his potential, the Warriors have a legitimate - if not huge - chance to go all the way, Bogdanovich says. "They're a year older, and with Iguodala, who knows how far they could go."

William Hill, a British gambling company, runs more than 100 sports books in Nevada and Delaware that list the Warriors at 10-1 to win the NBA title.

The favorite is the Miami Heat (11-5), but that doesn't mean Miami is a lock. "They're not unbeatable," Bogdanovich said. "I don't think you can just hand the trophy to the Heat. Lots of things have to go right for them to repeat."

Other strong contenders include the Indiana Pacers at 8-1 and the Oklahoma City Thunder at 13-2. Bogdanovich says the Thunder could win it all if they stay healthy, but with guard Russell Westbrook's recent knee surgery, "they're not starting out on the right foot."

A perennial contender that's cost sports books a lot of money in recent years is the Los Angeles Lakers, but Bogdanovich doesn't see them making the playoffs: "Father Time - and bad personnel decisions - caught up with them." The Lakers are 35-1 to win the title. The other L.A. team, the Clippers, are 8-1 to win it all.

A word of advice: Futures bets should be made in small amounts for fun, as the house typically keeps about 25 percent of money wagered. If you're serious about betting, stick with wagering on individual games, where the house take is about 5 percent.

Sports betting isn't legal in California, but it is in Nevada; wagers can also be made online at sites based outside the United States.

One such site is Bovada.lv - its sports book manager, Kevin Bradley, noted the Warriors opened at 25-1 and have dropped to 16-1 (still better odds than Warriors futures at William Hill and elsewhere).

"We took a lot of money on the Warriors early on," he said. But he still doesn't consider the Warriors a top-tier team, among the likes of the Heat, Bulls and Thunder.

"Basketball isn't often like hockey, where a sleeper team can get hot and win it all," Bradley said. "Barring a miracle, teams like Sacramento (300-1) won't make it."

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." Email: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

College football: Few deserve your bets for title

The college football season kicks off Thursday and shifts into high gear this weekend, but with so many teams vying for the Bowl Championship Series title, it can be hard to figure out which have the best shot at the championship.

That's where the odds come in - even if you don't want to bet on college games, the odds that Vegas and online booking sites place on teams can give you a sense of who's at the front of the pack.

The Wynn/Encore sports book has Alabama as the favorite at 11:5 to win the BCS title game Jan. 6 in Pasadena. Ohio State is second at 5:1; Oregon is third at 8:1.

Stanford opened at 30:1, but is now 14:1, showing that lots of bettors like the team. "They're a good team, a solid team," says Johnny Avello, Wynn's director of race and sports operations, "but maybe a win or two away from having a shot at the title."

Wynn lists Cal at 250:1. "Forget it," Avello says.

The online betting site Bovada.lv has the over/under on Cal at four games, meaning the site expects the Bears to win only a third of their regular season games under new coach Sonny Dykes. The over/under on Stanford is 9.5 games, meaning that if you bet on the over and the Cardinal win 10 or more of their 12 contests, you win.

At Wynn's sportsbook, Stanford is 2:1 to win the Pac-12 conference; the favorite is Oregon at 6:5.

College football futures are different than NFL futures because so few NCAA teams have a legitimate title shot, Avello says.

In the NFL you can squeak into the playoffs at 9-7, then get hot and win the Super Bowl. NCAA contenders are picked by computer and committee, meaning it's virtually impossible to bounce back from, say, a three-loss season and make the title game. That will be slightly more likely next season, when the NCAA launches a four-team playoff.

Teams like Alabama now have an advantage because of their history of success and the strength of their conferences. By comparison, Boise State went undefeated in the 2009 regular season, but didn't have a chance to play for the title because the BCS committee deemed its schedule too soft.

For single-game bets, Avello says the NCAA is different than the NFL because college teams won't sit on a lead. A team winning 38-13 with five minutes to go may try to run up the score because routs can lead to higher rankings. So it may end up covering a 30-point spread.

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

5 players you shouldn't be at the poker table

Regardless of your skill level, poker fundamentally is a social game. You sit around a table, alongside other humans, for hours at a clip. And you play a game. Unless you want to break up the table, it's important to comport yourself in ways that aren't offensive to your opponents.

With this in mind, based on a recent session at Casino M8trix in San Jose, here are five personas to avoid and five easy solutions to change your behavior, stat.

The smelly guy: There is no strategic advantage to smelling like a sewer. If you can afford to throw down a few hundred dollars at a no-limit table, you can afford to bathe. If players keep requesting seat changes from the spots next to you, it's a good bet you should have showered after leaving the gym.

The staller: Granted, some decisions in poker require serious thinking. But players who move at the speed of sloths and take multiple minutes before every call, fold or raise can derail a game. I equate this experience to conversing with a slow talker - at first it's uncomfortable, then it's just maddening. If you notice opponents calling "time" on you repeatedly, perhaps it's time to order a coffee or head home.

The kvetch: The Yiddish word for "complain" is kvetch, and, at the poker table, this sort of behavior is atrocious. The worst offenders are those who complain about bad beats - especially if the bad beats in question happened at other tables in other cardrooms at other times. If you're reminiscing to what feels like a bunch of crickets, you could be this person. The solution is simple: Shut up.

The lecher: One sad reality at Bay Area cardrooms is that an overwhelming number of poker players are men. Just because female sightings are rare, however, doesn't mean it's acceptable to leer at waitresses as they flit by. This behavior is particularly egregious when the staring actually stalls the game. If you catch yourself fantasizing about the woman who just delivered your Kung Pao chicken, get up and ask her out. Otherwise just play cards.

The aggressor: There is a benefit to overaggressive play at the poker table every once in a while. But throwing it all on the table for (just about) every hand is irritating. This behavior fails because it effectively prevents most of your (saner) opponents from playing. If you find yourself frustrated that nobody is calling your pre-flop all-ins, it likely is time to slow down a bit. Or hit the weight room.

Matt Villano is a freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Betting the 49ers in London: They're unlikely to falter

In case you haven't heard, this weekend's 49ers game against the Jacksonville Jaguars is being played at Wembley Stadium in London.

Pundits would have you think the change of scenery will have some bearing on the game. They'll bloviate about how the Niners will be jet-lagged, about how the defense might suffer on neutral ground, about how Colin Kaepernick's timing on passes could be off by just a hair.

If you plan on betting the game, however, don't be scared: The hometown team is going to cover what opened as a 16.5-point spread. I know, I know, earlier this month I picked the Denver Broncos to cover a 28-point spread against the very same Jags, and the favorites faltered, big time. But that's precisely why the Niners will cover up to two touchdowns - or maybe even more.

Allow me to explain.

First, let's state the obvious: The winless Jaguars are abysmal, and the 5-2 49ers are an underachieving, injury-riddled team that is getting stronger every week. Second, let's nod to the neutral site: Generally speaking, games at neutral sites receive what insiders call a "true spread," meaning oddsmakers do not account for home field advantage. (The Green Bay Packers, for instance, always get a few extra points when they play at home.)

Finally, follow the money. Despite the huge line in that Broncos-Jaguars game from two weeks back, reports indicate that the "handle" (the overall amount of money wagered) on the game was lower than expected, meaning bettors largely stayed away from both sides. Oddsmakers aren't going to want to turn people off like that again.

If you don't feel comfortable with the point spread, there's always the total. That number opened at 40.5. Considering how the Niners offense has come together in the past few weeks, Kaep and the gang likely are good for at least 35 on their own.

Another option: A proposition bet that is becoming known as the "Jags prop." In an effort to inspire bets behind the Jaguars, during the Denver game some oddsmakers offered a prop on whether the Jags would hold a lead. The prop saw decent action that first week. If you can find it again (online or in a Nevada sports book) before the 49ers game, grab it.

A third scenario for betting on the game? Hop a flight and follow the team. Yours truly is living in London this fall, and I've learned firsthand that the gambling scene here is robust. Casinos abound. Sports books are everywhere. And you have to be only 18 to bet.

Most London books offer obscure NFL bets such as winning margin, first/last to score and whether the point total will be odd or even. The best part: In London, there's no vigorish, which means every bet is free.

Matt Villano is a freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Don't fear poker risks - evaluate them

"I can't believe you called," said my opponent shaking his head. "I just can't believe you called."

We were playing Texas Hold'em at the Rio in Las Vegas during the World Series of Poker. But this wasn't a tournament - it was a cash game in the hotel's small poker room off the slot-filled lobby. I had the jack and nine of hearts and bet $15 pre-flop. Three players called. When three hearts fell on the flop (the king and two low cards), I'd made my flush. But I wanted to end the hand quickly in case anyone had a higher heart. I didn't want an opponent to top me if a heart dropped on the turn or river.

So I bet $100. Two players folded, one took me all in and had me covered. I'd started the hand with just over $450 and had about $350 in chips left in front of me. I considered the possibilities:

-- My opponent has the ace or queen of hearts and another heart for a better flush. Unlikely but a scary possibility.

-- He has two hearts but neither is as high as my jack so he's trailing me. If he has this, he'll want to end the hand before another heart falls, thinking I may have one high heart. Quite possible, but based on his agitated body language and pre-flop play, not likely.

-- He has a high heart, probably the ace, and has two chances to hit a high or nut flush. More likely.

-- He's bluffing and has nothing. Remotely possible.

I have a friend who thinks poker is all luck, but this is where it becomes a skill game. My gut tells me he's either got the nut flush draw or has hit a lower flush than mine. If his flush is lower, I'll win. If he's on a draw with the ace, I'm about a 2:1 favorite. I later checked CardPlayer.com's poker odds calculator (http://bit.ly/RAvLe) and found my odds of winning were 71 percent.

So I call. He shows the ace of hearts and a blank. Neither the turn nor river is a heart; I pull in a pot in excess of $900. I ask him why he's so incredulous that I called. "You risked your whole stack!" he blurts out.

I did, but it was a risk that made sense. A few years ago when I was a risk-averse novice, I probably would have folded. But now I don't fear risks. I evaluate them. And this is a good way to approach the game. If you believe the odds are in your favor, go for the big win, because there's nothing like paying for your trip to Vegas by taking a hefty pot at the poker table.

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Friday 29 November 2013

Bay Area cardroom crawl: Good spots south of S.F.

There are two main benefits to living in a state that allows for cardrooms: (1) plenty of local options and (2) some of the rooms are close enough to visit in succession on the same day.

With this in mind, I took a recent Tuesday to engage in a Bay Area cardroom crawl.

My plan for the day: I'd start before breakfast (since most of these places have restaurants that offer tasty egg dishes), and hit as many cardrooms as I could before the afternoon rush hour. I challenged myself to play at least one different game at every stop. My fixed budget for the excursion: $500.

The morning began around 8 a.m. at Lucky Chances in Colma. Here, while seated at a table of $3/$6 Limit Texas Hold 'Em, I wolfed down a Denver omelet and some dry wheat toast while waiting for decent cards. To describe the action as "sleepy" would be an understatement; during the first hour of play, one of my opponents dozed off at the table.

The cards weren't much better. I lost my initial $100 buy-in after being rivered in three consecutive hands. Then I lost another $50 after that (hey, even gambling writers can tilt).

My next stop was in San Bruno: Artichoke Joe's. I've had lousy poker luck here over the years, so I instead gravitated toward California Blackjack (which is a variation of the traditional game that complies with state regs that say the house can't win). Within minutes (thanks to two well-timed blackjacks), I had doubled my $100 buy-in and walked away.

The situation improved even more at the third stop on my outing, Bay 101 Casino in San Jose. I killed 10 minutes at an EZ Baccarat table (where I won $16) while waiting for a seat at a lively $2/$3/$5 game of No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em. Once I got my spot, I figured I'd stay and play through a cheeseburger lunch. Then I realized that two players at the opposite end of the table were terrible, and I lengthened my session to deprive them of their chips.

I turned my $300 buy-in into $627 (and could have won more, if not for a bad beat on the last hand that cost me a $115 pot).

My Peninsula/South Bay card room crawl ended at the area's newest casino: the uber-hip Casino M8trix, on the other side of the 101 in San Jose. A friend had suggested I try Pai Gow Tiles. I had prepared for this moment for weeks, studying the tile combinations and practicing online. Nothing, however, prepared me for bad luck: I lost my entire $200 buy-in in less than 20 minutes.

Back in the car, I did the math: Eight hours, four cardrooms, two meals and a net gain of $93. Not a bad way to spend a Tuesday at all.

Matt Villano is a freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Don't be intimidated: Making the most of casino visit

Whether you're a total neophyte or a grizzled gambling veteran, casinos and cardrooms can be intimidating. Maybe it's all the stern faces. Maybe it's the fact that most places just assume players know how to play. Heck, maybe it's because some people just aren't very friendly. Here are five ways to change the vibe.

Do your homework: Intimidation often comes from a lack of knowledge about a new situation. Educate yourself about the experience before you go. Boning up on table games is easy; there are dozens of websites out there to walk you through how to play. (My favorite is www.wizardofodds.com.) You can hit the Web for primers on specific casinos and cardrooms, too.

Watch and learn: You pick up a ton just watching a game unfold. Yes, you will feel ridiculous doing nothing but watching other people win or lose. But once you get over that awkwardness - provided you're really paying attention - you'll learn most of what you need to sit down and play. (A gentle warning: If you're not playing, do not interact with players unless they interact with you first. This is bad form. The house also could consider it cheating.)

Play dumb: It's hard to spite an idiot. With this in mind, one of the best ways to break through stares of opponents and cardroom personnel is to make it clear you don't have a clue. Curious about a particular game? Ask the dealer to explain. Wondering about house rules? Have other players set you straight. Sooner or later, you'll get the answers you seek. If you don't, there's always another casino or cardroom down the road.

Bring a wingman (or woman): Most situations are less intimidating when you experience them with a buddy. It's best to bring a friend with commanding knowledge of gambling; this way he or she can address questions or concerns you might have over the course of the night. Even if your pal isn't a card sharp, having him or her by your side will make the experience more comfortable. (Just make sure you're actually paying attention if you find yourself risking big money.)

Join the un-fun: If you're determined to tough out a room full of cold shoulders but don't feel like being proactive about it, you always can try the "can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach. This means trying on your own poker face - and keeping it on for the duration of your visit. No, this strategy won't make you any friends. It will, however, put you in perfect position to focus your energy on what matters most when you're gambling: the odds to win.

Matt Villano is a Healdsburg freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

Kimberly Lansing: Marin resident leaving WPT spot

Three years ago, when Marin resident Kimberly Lansing was named the first female anchor of the World Poker Tour, the poker world swooned. Since then, media outlets have dubbed her "the Bob Costas of poker" for her abilities to manage a broadcast and analyze hands quickly.

Now, however, she is headed for the rail: She has announced that this season of the WPT will be her last and that Lynn Gilmartin will take her place when the season ends in October.

For Lansing, the decision has been bittersweet - exciting to start thinking about the next phase of her career but saddening to think about turning her back on the game that helped make her who she is today. "Poker has given me a lot over the years," she said recently, noting that she met her husband, Zach Hyman, through the game. "I can't imagine life without it."

That's precisely why Lansing won't be giving up cold turkey. Because she, Hyman and his twin brother, Matt (who made the final table in this year's WPT World Championship) are poker players on the professional circuit, Lansing says she will attend tournaments at Bay 101 in San Jose and other cardrooms.

She adds that she and her husband are building a house near Lake Tahoe, and they'll have a room big enough for a regulation-size poker table for home games. She's also been hitting the felt: For her final event, instead of sitting behind the anchor desk, Lansing played in the WPT Foundation Ladies' Night Invitational at the Bicycle Casino in Los Angeles. The event will air during Season XII of WPT on Fox Sports Net, which begins in March.

Lansing says she wants to continue her career in television broadcasting or hosting, and acknowledges that most of those jobs probably will be in Los Angeles or New York. Still, she vows: She'll never move out of the Bay Area.

"I just think this is a perfect place to raise kids and live," she said. "My husband is from here. I love it here. I'd rather commute to L.A. or New York than leave the Bay Area."

As for the game itself, Lansing says she hopes women continue to learn the game and play it. She adds that when she steps away from the WPT, she'll take away an appreciation for how broad and complex poker can be.

"If I've learned anything about this game, it's that it is ever changing," she said. "Right when you think that you know it really well, right when you think you have it figured out, you get a bad beat or a bad read and all of a sudden everything is upside down. I know it's just gambling, but this is what makes it interesting."

Matt Villano is a Healdsburg freelance writer. E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mattvillano


View the original article here

JC Tran discusses World Series of Poker final table

Sacramento's JC Tran has come a long way since arriving in California as a 2-year-old immigrant in 1979. Tran is chip leader going into the final table of the World Series of Poker's Main Event, the man with the best shot of taking home the $8.3 million top prize.

A seasoned pro, Tran honed his game at the Capitol Casino in Sacramento and has won two WSOP bracelets and a World Poker Tour title. He has career earnings of more than $8 million. But years ago, he was known for playing fast and loose.

"When I was younger I won a lot of money, but I didn't know the true value of a dollar," he said in a phone interview. Now 36, Tran says he's a changed man and his top priority is his family. He has a 2 1/2-year-old son and a daughter due next month.

"I've cleaned it up a lot. I don't put myself in situations where I'm playing crazy in cash games and losing big chunks of money," he said. "My family taught me well to be humble and appreciate life - we never had a lot of money. Now you won't see me coin-flipping in a cash game hand for $100,000. I'm still grinding."

Tran will earn a minimum of $733,000 for making the final table, to be held Nov. 4-5 at the Rio hotel in Las Vegas. With his strong chip position (38 million chips - no other player has more than 30 million), he's likely to add several million dollars to his bank account. But he doesn't plan to buy anything special, just invest in his kids' college fund and save for retirement.

"I have what I need," he said. "I don't need fancy jewelry or any of that stuff."

Tran says he's in good shape mentally for the final table and can use his towering chip stack "to keep pushing it and win some hands." But he won't be too aggressive because at the Main Event final table, "every pay jump is like winning another tournament." For example the difference between finishing second and third is more than $1.4 million.

Tran said he can play aggressive or tight. "That's an advantage I have over guys who have just one style." But he's not taking any of his opponents lightly.

"In the end I'm playing with eight other guys who have played seven great days of poker," he said. "No one is easy money here. Everyone has potential to win and everyone's a threat."

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Online betting: Bovada's good reputation for service

I've never been a big fan of online betting. For sports, I'd rather bet with a bookie or, when in Nevada, wager at a sportsbook and watch the games on giant TV screens.

In California, sports betting isn't legal, so many people turn to online gambling sites. The legality of betting via offshore sportsbooks remains in question, but for now online wagering is popular and generally unobstructed by federal authorities.

I chose Bovada.lv because I'd long followed it to get odds on games and futures, and it has a good reputation for customer service. A reviewer of online gaming sites, MyTopSportsBooks.com, says Bovada - which used to be called Bodog - has the "best customer service in the industry" and the "best mobile betting."

Most enticing, Bovada offers a 50 percent signup bonus, up to $250. Here's how it works: Say you bet $200 on the 49ers at even money. If you win you get $500 ($200 in winnings, $100 in bonus plus your original wager).

So a few weeks ago I took the plunge and authorized a $250 deposit on my credit card. But I hit a snag: The charge was denied as "irregular." Visa sent a text alert warning me of possible fraud. I texted back to note the charge was legit, but I still had to call Visa to authorize the charge. (While this was a problem a couple of years ago, it's reportedly not as widespread an issue today.)

Then I started betting. The odds are standard: Typically you have to bet $110 to win $100, and the site is relatively easy to use. Bovada also offers proposition bets on everything from NBA scoring leaders to Academy Award winners, but the site keeps a larger proportion of money bet on props, typically 25 percent. (That's true in Nevada casinos as well - given the odds, props, including futures, should be small wagers made for fun.)

I put my entire $250 on Indianapolis, giving three points, to beat San Diego on Oct. 14, but the Colts lost, so I didn't get to see how quickly Bovada would pay. I've had problems in the past getting my cash out of another online betting site, but reports are that Bovada pays promptly. A reviewer on MyTopSportsBooks said, "When I've requested a payout ... they come quick."

Other leading online betting sites include BetOnline.com, TopBet.com and GTbets.com.

It can be easy to get carried away betting online because you're not handling money. But if you bet responsibly, it can add a thrill to watching games, wherever you are.

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

JC Tran discusses World Series of Poker final table

Sacramento's JC Tran has come a long way since arriving in California as a 2-year-old immigrant in 1979. Tran is chip leader going into the final table of the World Series of Poker's Main Event, the man with the best shot of taking home the $8.3 million top prize.

A seasoned pro, Tran honed his game at the Capitol Casino in Sacramento and has won two WSOP bracelets and a World Poker Tour title. He has career earnings of more than $8 million. But years ago, he was known for playing fast and loose.

"When I was younger I won a lot of money, but I didn't know the true value of a dollar," he said in a phone interview. Now 36, Tran says he's a changed man and his top priority is his family. He has a 2 1/2-year-old son and a daughter due next month.

"I've cleaned it up a lot. I don't put myself in situations where I'm playing crazy in cash games and losing big chunks of money," he said. "My family taught me well to be humble and appreciate life - we never had a lot of money. Now you won't see me coin-flipping in a cash game hand for $100,000. I'm still grinding."

Tran will earn a minimum of $733,000 for making the final table, to be held Nov. 4-5 at the Rio hotel in Las Vegas. With his strong chip position (38 million chips - no other player has more than 30 million), he's likely to add several million dollars to his bank account. But he doesn't plan to buy anything special, just invest in his kids' college fund and save for retirement.

"I have what I need," he said. "I don't need fancy jewelry or any of that stuff."

Tran says he's in good shape mentally for the final table and can use his towering chip stack "to keep pushing it and win some hands." But he won't be too aggressive because at the Main Event final table, "every pay jump is like winning another tournament." For example the difference between finishing second and third is more than $1.4 million.

Tran said he can play aggressive or tight. "That's an advantage I have over guys who have just one style." But he's not taking any of his opponents lightly.

"In the end I'm playing with eight other guys who have played seven great days of poker," he said. "No one is easy money here. Everyone has potential to win and everyone's a threat."

Michael Shapiro is a freelance writer and author of "A Sense of Place." E-mail: 96hours@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shapirowrites


View the original article here

Wednesday 20 November 2013

2014 Mercedes-Benz E350 4Matic Wagon

2014 Mercedes-Benz E350 Wagon

This year, the big story for Mercedes-Benz is undoubtedly the launch of its 2014 S-Class, traditionally the tip of the Three-Pointed Star's technological spear. It's been said many times that if you want to see how the future of the automobile will look, take a gander at the S-Class, and you'll see a lot of cutting-edge wonders that will trickle down and become more commonplace a generation or three down the road. Yet due to an odd product cadence issue, it's actually the facelifted 2014 E-Class seen here that marks the introduction of a lot of new technology for the brand. The sedan and wagon variants are already on sale, and the coupe and convertible will arrive shortly, but all figure to be on the market ahead of the new S-Class.

The E-Class is actually no less significant to Mercedes than the S-Class – it's known to be a huge profit-driver for the company and represents over 20 percent of the company's US sales. All of which might go some way toward explaining why this mid-cycle overhaul is a lot more comprehensive than what we normally see from Mercedes.

We recently spent an afternoon on Michigan's country roads in a longroof W212 to see if the changes make the new E more desirable.

Driving Notes You have to love Mercedes' candor. In an age where every automakers' marketing department tries to spice up its wagon's appeal by calling it something else (Sportwagen, Sport Wagon, Touring, etc.), Benz is refreshingly honest – this is the Wagon, pure and simple.Based on looks alone, to this author's eyes, this E-Class is a major improvement over the exiting car, it part because the latter's front lighting was particularly jarring. The new model includes substantial sheetmetal-level changes (even doorskins and rear fenders!) that really amp up both its substantialness and the aggressiveness, particularly in Sport trim shown here (recognizable by the pie-plate-sized emblem in the grille and gaping air intakes). Everyone is doing LED daytime running lamps these days, but the E's are particularly interesting and well done. It must be noted that some Autoblog editors don't care for this new look, however, instead preferring its predecessor.Our test car for the day was this 4Matic-equipped E350 Sport, with a 3.5-liter V6 offering 302 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque apportioned through a seven-speed paddleshift automatic. There's an eco mode with a pretty well done start-stop system, and we liked the power and shift delivery in both standard and sport modes. Manual mode adds a further level of control and interactivity, but shifts are occasionally reluctant or disallowed.Later this fall, a four-cylinder diesel, the E250 Bluetec, bows with 190 horsepower, 369 pound-feet of torque and available all-wheel drive. EPA numbers haven't been released yet, but Mercedes is confident it can net 40 miles per gallon on the freeway.There's a pretty insane amount of protect-you-from-yourself-and-others active safety tech that debuted here, actually ahead of the S-Class. A stereo-camera ahead of the rearview mirror aids in all manner of safety-related items, including Distronic cruise control. Now with steering assist to keep you in the middle of your lane (even without lane markers), Distronic also lets you follow traffic "semi-autonomously." BAS Plus (read: brake assist) can now detect pedestrians and other forms of crossing traffic and prepare the car's safety systems to help it avoid or mitigate an accident.The interior has arguably changed the least, but it's still very comfortable, if a bit sterile. There's a new gauge binnacle and newly available open-pore wood and lighter colors helps liven things up a lot.With the second two rows stowed, cargo space swells to 57.4 cubic feet – useful, but still smaller than many compact crossovers.Speaking of those seats, we don't know how much owners use them, but we love that MB still includes the option of rear-facing third row. For a long time, the E-Class was the only such jumpseat configuration on the market until the Tesla Model S showed up. Could kiddie 'way backs' be on the way back? Nah...Overall, this is a much deeper-than-normal refresh for a brand that typically exercises a light touch on such things. We asked Benz reps whether this is the sort of thing that we can expect more from, and they downplayed the likelihood of it being the start of a new trend. Bummer.Engine:3.5L V6Power:302 HP / 273 LB-FTTransmission:7-Speed Auto0-60 Time:6.9 SecondsTop Speed:130 MPH (limited)Drivetrain:All-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:3,979 LBSSeating:2+3+2Cargo:57.4 CU-FT (max)MPG:19 City /27 HWYBase Price:$58,600Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2013 Chrysler 300C John Varvatos Limited Edition

 

Who is John Varvatos? If you're like me, that's the question you were asking after seeing commercials that advertised a limited-edition model of the Chrysler 300 with this mystery man's name attached. If you're not like me and consider yourself a fashionista even in the slightest, then you probably already know that John Varvatos is a successful menswear designer who cut his teeth in the fashion houses of Ralph Lauren's Polo and Calvin Klein. He's also a native of Detroit, which makes the joining of his brand and that of Chrysler's more intelligible, what with the Auburn Hills-based automaker still eking efficacy from its nearly three-year-old "Imported from Detroit" tagline.


Whenever one of these co-branded vehicles crosses my path, I try to judge them according to some simple questions. The first is, does the co-branding make sense for the target audience? And the second is, do the changes improve or diminish the experience of the standard vehicle? With this partnership, both brands are clearly aiming at the same target, or perhaps Chrysler hopes its aim will improve by partnering with the JV set, bringing it closer to that bullseye of style-conscious trendsetters.


The second question, meanwhile, can be answered with your eyes alone, as no mechanical changes are included among the Varvatos upgrades. Despite that, the 300C John Varvatos Edition is priced above – well above – all other 300 sedans save the 300 SRT8, suggesting that cool is not sold by the barrel (was it ever?) and Mr. Varvatos is a dealer in the stuff. Yet while I couldn't actually tell you if John Varvatos was a designer or a ditch digger before Chrysler introduced us, I do like his style, and the man knows how to dress a car.


Driving Notes There are actually two separate John Varvatos models of the 300C available. The murdered-out one you see here is priced from $44,345 and available only with rear-wheel drive, and there's a less expensive version called the John Varvatos Luxury Edition, available with either rear- or all-wheel drive, that loses the emo look in favor of shiny, happy platinum chrome trim and three other available (though still dark) colors. However, only the more expensive model gets a serialized badge on the center console. Chrysler offered just 2,000 examples for the 2013 model year (this one is No. 15), and while the automaker has confirmed that the Limited Edition will be back for the 2014 model year, it's unclear at this time exactly how many examples will be made.The visual changes focus on an entire blackout of the 300C's exterior, which includes the deeply rich and sparkly Phantom Black Tri-Coat Pearl paint and the 20-inch Titanium painted wheels. A black grille surrounded by a titanium-finish frame, and titanium-finish fog lamp rings, headlight bezels, mirror caps and exterior badging complete the Darth Varvatos look. It's actually quite fetching in person thanks to the contrast that's still present between the pure black paint and titanium-finish pieces.Kudos to Mr. V for not plastering his branding all over the exterior; the only indication it's a John Varvatos Limited Edition model, besides the color, is a small badge of the designer's logo on the rear.The branding is much less inconspicuous inside, with Varvatos logos debossed into the seatbacks and on both the speedometer and tachometer, the analog clock, the navigation system's start-up screen and the aforementioned serialized badge on the center console. Looking past that, the white contrasting stitching on the dash looks great, and the Diesel Gray double-stitch on the seats exhibits premium craftsmanship. Even the Charcoal Hydrographic woodgrain trim is monochromatic.I feel obliged to give at least a couple of notes on some non-Varvotos-related items in this 300C. The seats were not as comfortable as I expected and lacked any amount of bolstering that would be helpful in hot handling maneuvers. The Chrysler Uconnect infotainment system still stands up as the most user-friendly and responsive on the market. Lastly, the Beats by Dr. Dre audio system, a $995 option on top of the Varvatos package, offers overwhelming bass even at the default setting. I turned the bass all the way down and even that level felt like the default setting of some other stereos.This tester has Chrysler's 3.6-liter V6 engine rated at 292 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque. While I'd normally prefer a V8, the V6 suits the Varvatos edition better. It's still plenty powerful, very smooth and returns an EPA-estimated 19 miles per gallon in the city and 31 on the highway. The latter is thanks to the V6 model's eight-speed automatic transmission, which has the engine hardly working on interstates. Shifts are almost imperceptible, which is good because they happen so often. Its one knock is its hesitating to leave the higher gears for passing maneuvers. Using the shift paddles can override the automatic, and there's a Sport mode to keep the engine on boil all the time, though fuel economy suffers. The eight-speed is only available with the V6, while V8 buyers have to settle for the old five-speed automatic.The 300C in general isn't a sport sedan, so as you'd expect, it shines more on the boulevard than the backroads. The ride is smooth, even with those 20-inch rollers, and spoiling four passengers is this car's purpose in life. This model, however, has the optional Dual-Pane Panoramic Sunroof (a $1,495 option), which steals away some precious headroom inches. The one dynamic quibble I had was with its steering, which felt overly heavy, even at low speeds.While I like the look of this 300C John Varvatos Limited Edition, I find myself considering it in the same way I shop for clothes. Browsing the John Varvatos website, I'd pick out his Linen V-Neck, Hampton Fit Pant and Chuck Taylor Double Zip High Tops to wear in a heartbeat. They'd make a great outfit, but I'm not going to pay $168 for a t-shirt, $1,595 for pants and $170 for a pair of Chucks. Likewise, the JV Limited Edition starts $14,000 above a base 300C at $30,345, and with the options on this tester and a $995 destination charge, crests $50,000. I'm not so square that I think fashion shouldn't command a premium, but for these markups, I'd like more than a different color palette.Engine:3.6L V6Power:292 HP / 260 LB-FTTransmission:8-Speed AutoDrivetrain:Rear-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:4,270 LBSSeating:2+3Cargo:16.3 CU-FTMPG:19 City / 31 HWYBase Price:$40,845As-Tested Price:$50,620Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2014 Cadillac XTS Vsport

 

Not long after bombing around the Milford Road Course in the new CTS Vsport, Cadillac invited me to try out its other new-for-2014 Vsport model: the XTS. And despite using the same twin-turbocharged 3.6-liter V6 from the CTS, the Vsport package takes on a whole new meaning here in Cadillac's softer flagship.


In the CTS, this trim perfectly bridges the gap between the standard models and the hardcore CTS-V, and is focused on being the best-driving version of the range without a standalone V badge. The XTS, however, has no proper V model, so the Vsport becomes the new range-topper for that line by default. But unlike the CTS Vsport, which uses rear-wheel-drive architecture and is focused on driving dynamics above all, the XTS is geared toward a much different customer.


The entire XTS experience is far more concerned with plush comfort than handling prowess, and while this Vsport model certainly ups the ante with more power and some mild suspension and steering tweaks, it's not exactly what we'd call a particularly engaging experience. But that doesn't mean it isn't good.


Driving Notes Cadillac's new TTV6 engine is just as excellent in the XTS as it is in the CTS, though it's lost a bit of pep. In the XTS Vsport, total output is rated at 410 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque – decreases of 10 hp and 61 lb-ft versus the smaller, lighter CTS. Still, this engine represents gains of 105 hp and 105 lb-ft of twist compared to the standard XTS' naturally aspirated 3.6-liter engine, and this healthy bump in power is indeed welcomed.Cadillac states that the all-wheel-drive, 4,215-pound XTS Vsport will run to 60 miles per hour in 4.9 seconds. (That's half a second quicker than a base Porsche Cayman, for reference.) And full-throttle acceleration run is accompanied by the deep growl of Cadillac's new twin-turbo motor – it's very much audible here in the XTS, much to my delight.This added power makes the XTS Vsport an incredible highway cruiser, able to pass slow-moving semis with absolutely no drama, all while keeping true to the sedan's core values of being comfortable, quiet and solid on the road. I do the Detroit-to-Chicago run more times in a year than I can count, and the XTS Vsport would be an absolutely ideal pick for this sort of activity.My afternoon in the XTS took me down some of my favorite local backroads – places I've tested countless cars before, and stretches of pavement that I know like the back of my hand. And while I think the XTS Vsport is generally a very nice luxury sedan, a sports car it absolutely is not. Even with the supposedly reworked suspension geometry, the car still floats around and rolls in corners, and the very much front-biased all-wheel-drive system still allows the front tires – Bridgestone Potenza P245/40R20s, for what it's worth – to wash out in enthusiastic cornering. Beyond that, torque steer presents itself when going hard on the throttle, again showing weakness of this AWD architecture. Steering feel is pretty poor, too, and though things are supposed to be better in Sport mode, all you get is added weight to the rack – no actual addition of linearity or direct involvement.So it's not exactly a Vsport in terms of handling performance. Fine. This XTS is still far better to drive than the base model, with a slick-shifting eight-speed automatic transmission that's perfectly matched to the more potent engine. And even with the added power and torque, this XTS will still return 30 miles per gallon on the highway. Not bad at all.Inside, it's the same XTS it always was, and that's fine by me. The seats are incredibly comfortable, the reconfigurable LCD display looks great, and the CUE system, while remaining frustrating and not incredibly intuitive to use, still offers a whole raft of technology and functionality right at your fingertips. The cockpit is very nicely appointed, wind noise and road noise are nearly nonexistent, and really, it's a fine place to pass the time.Visually, the Vsport is set apart by its larger, 20-inch wheels, unique badging and a refreshed, good-looking front grille. That fascia treatment is a small touch, but one that works well and strikes me as a really thoughtful upgrade for this sporty-ish model.Opting for the Vsport will set you back $69,095 – nearly $25,000 over the starting price of a base, front-wheel-drive XTS. Of course, you get a ton more in the way of standard equipment, as well as the awesome engine, but even fully decked out, this means dishing out over $70,000 for a fully optioned example like the one you see here.That puts the XTS Vsport in a different competitive set – now playing with cars like a base Lexus LS or a loaded-up Hyundai Equus. And while those cars don't really offer any great shakes in terms of driver involvement, neither does this XTS.So while this Vsport treatment isn't nearly as bonkers (or as good) as the CTS package, at only $5,000 more than a loaded XTS Platinum with the base engine, it's not a bad upgrade to have. This XTS is as comfortable and easy to drive as it ever was, and while the Vsport formula doesn't radically shake anything up, it's still a great addition to the range.Engine:Twin-Turbo 3.6L V6Power:410 HP / 369 LB-FTTransmission:8-Speed Auto0-60 Time:4.9 SecondsTop Speed:135 MPH (limited)Drivetrain:All-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:4,215 LBSSeating:2+3Cargo:18 CU-FTMPG:21 City / 30 HWYBase Price:$69,095As-Tested Price:$71,015Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2014 Volkswagen Beetle GSR

 

Despite all of the positive reviews it has garnered since its introduction in 2011, the Volkswagen Beetle still hasn't hooked me. It's nice to drive, and with a variety of engine choices (including diesel) and two different bodystyles, it's an incredibly versatile little car, ready to meet the needs of a whole host of customers. But personally, I just don't think I could wake up to that happy-friendly (yet sort of drowsy?) face every morning.


For 2014, Volkswagen is offering this limited edition GSR model – only 3,500 examples will be made – based on the sportier R-Line trim, and painted in a unique yellow/black scheme that pays homage to the "Yellow Black Racer" of the 1970s. It's a fun, flashy little thing, and I recently spent a week with GSR No. 216 to see if it would change my mind about the Beetle formula as a whole.


Driving Notes As I said, the GSR – or more specifically, the Beetle Turbo – is pretty great to drive. It uses VW's lovely 2.0-liter turbocharged inline four-cylinder engine, rated at 210 horsepower and 207 pound-feet of torque. Equipped with the six-speed manual transmission of my test car, the Beetle GSR will hit 60 miles per hour in a very respectable 6.6 seconds.Not surprisingly, considering its dimensions, powertrain and weight, the Beetle GSR drives a lot like Volkswagen's own GTI – one of my favorite hot hatches. The Bug's wheelbase is an inch and a half shorter, and though it sits 0.7 inches higher off the ground, the Beetle is actually shorter in overall height by 0.2 inches. A bit of weight is saved here, too, with the GSR weighing in at 3,056 pounds compared to the GTI's 3,113. The 2.0T engine in the GSR is actually good for an additional 10 hp over the GTI, as well.Unique to the GSR are 19-inch Tornado alloy wheels, wrapped in P235/40R19 Continental ContiProContact tires. But even with the ever-so-slightly sportier R-Line setup and this relatively large set of rolling stock, the car never felt crashy or too stiff on the road, even when traversing the rough surfaces in and around Detroit. Instead, the Beetle offers a comfortable, solid ride feel, great for highway cruising and pretty nicely set up for moments of aggression on twisty backroads. It's no track attacker, to be sure, but it's a really solid balance that's great for an everyday driver – something I've said before about the GTI.The standard Beetle models already stand out in a crowd, thanks to its distinctive shape and too-cute looks (though the new-generation car uses a decidedly more masculine design approach). But man, this GSR sure does garner a whole mess of attention. A girl in a Mini nearly rear-ended someone on a side street while sticking her neck out the window to check out the GSR, and the guys at the car wash laughed at me. Literally every day, I was pointed at, smiled at, and, of course, honked at by other Beetle owners. Of course, the unique, limited-edition black-and-yellow color scheme is to blame for a lot of this attention, but even so, it doesn't strike me as an unusual color combo for the Beetle.Inside, the GSR was loaded to the gills with every amenity offered on the Beetle models – sunroof, navigation, Bluetooth audio, heated seats, and so on. The black leather seats have yellow contrast stitching with special GSR logos, and that same color treatment is carried over to the flat-bottomed steering wheel (that could stand to be a bit thicker-rimmed, methinks), with a serialized number plate below the R-Line logo, specifically for the GSR.Outside, in addition to the 19-inch wheels, GSR models come standard with bi-xenon headlamps with LED running lights, foglamps, and the rear spoiler of the Turbo model (which, for the record, I hate).But that's all for a price: just over $30,000, including $820 for destination. And while folks who like the unique Beetle package might not be put off by this number (a loaded Turbo starts at the same $29,995), to me, it seems like a far worse bargain than the already-sort-of-pricey, more functional, less-flashy, just-as-good-to-drive four-door GTI with the same options.So no, I'm not sold on the Beetle package, only because I love the GTI so much. But for those who like the added style of the iconic VW design, those GTI bones make for a really rewarding driving experience that'd be easy to live with day in and day out.Engine:Turbo 2.0L I4Power:210 HP / 207 LB-FTTransmission:6-Speed Manual0-60 Time:6.6 SecondsTop Speed:130 MPH (limited)Drivetrain:Front-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:3,056 LBSSeating:2+2Cargo:29.9 CU-FT (max)MPG:21 City / 30 HWYBase Price:$29,995As-Tested Price:$30,850Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2013 Opel Cascada

The Future Buick Verano Convertible?

2013 Opel Cascada

I wasn't wearing a pedometer while in Germany covering the Frankfurt Motor Show this year, but it's safe to say I walked more than a few miles between press conferences, shooting cars and trekking back to the media center on the first day alone. For this reason, it didn't take much convincing from General Motors for me to duck out of the Messe a day early and drive some of its latest Opel models. No, this didn't include the all-new Country Tourer, but I was able to drive the Opel Mokka (our Buick Encore), the Opel Adam and the Opel Cascada.

I focused most of my driving time behind the wheel of the Cascada, which went on sale in Europe earlier this year, since rumors are swirling that a Buick version of this convertible "could happen soon." Buick hasn't had a convertible since the Reatta, and GM has been lacking a non-performance, budget-minded convertible since the Pontiac brand – and its G6 – was dropped, so adding the Cascada to Buick showrooms could further help the reemerging brand compete in the near-luxury segment. Although the weather was too chilly (and occasionally rainy) to enjoy the Cascada with its top down for very long, I was able to clock a fair bit of drive time behind the wheel on roads ranging from the autobahn to tight roads in small, quaint villages.

Driving Notes Leaving Frankfurt, the drive route had us take the Autobahn away from the city where I was able to let the Cascada stretch its legs a little. This model was equipped with GM's new 1.6-liter direct-injected turbocharged inline four-cylinder engine – one of three available engines – producing 170 horsepower and 207 pound-feet of torque. Acceleration isn't one the Cascada's strengths, as it took the 3,820-pound convertible a while to get up to highway speeds (GM states a 0-62 mile per hour time of 9.6 seconds), but it had no problem cruising at around 125 mph, which is just short of the car's stated top speed of 137 mph. A Sport mode helps a little by making the throttle more responsive, but I would hope that if/when this car does come to the US, GM could find it in its heart to fit the US-spec version with the 250-hp turbo engine found under the hood of the platform-sharing Buick Verano Turbo... and while I'm making requests to GM, please leave the six-speed manual gearbox alone with the shifter's sporty throws and spot-on gear ratios.Once off the Autobahn, the drive route did a better job of showing off the Cascada's strong points, most notable of which was the lack of cowl shake along the numerous rough, cobblestone streets we encountered, but the winding mountain roads also showcased the convertible's handling maneuvers. Although the brakes look rather small lurking behind the 19-inch wheels, the Cascada stopped effortlessly and its electric power steering also helped make the fun part of the drive even more enjoyable. In all driving conditions, there is no hiding the fact that the Cascada is a heavy, front-wheel-drive convertible, but the level of all-around refinement and chassis tuning makes up for this as well as the car's anemic engine.This level of refinement was evident after just a few minutes in the car. Once we got up to our top speed of 124 mph, I was utterly surprised at how quiet the cabin was. The fabric top helped reduce cabin noise to a level that I would expect from a luxurious coupe instead of a relatively affordable soft-top convertible. The top takes 17 seconds to open or close, and it can be raised and lowered at speeds up to 31 mph. Even though its operation is rather slow, it seems far less jerky and clunky than the mechanisms found on the similarly sized Chrysler 200 Convertible equipped with a soft top. Better yet, the Cascada's cargo volume surpasses the 200 as well as the Volkswagen Eos.Once inside the Cascada, it's clear Opel isn't positioning this car as a budget droptop. This loaded-up tester came with heated/cooled front seats, heated steering wheel and comfortable seats wrapped in rich UV-protectant Nappa leather with decent side bolsters and adjustable thigh support – the front seats actually felt more Regal GS than Verano. Speaking of the Verano, most of the driver's cockpit looks very similar to what is currently found in Buick's entry-level sedan, but a nicer stitched-leather instrument panel hood adds a little extra pizazz. Other appreciated touches inside the Cascada include the electric "seatbelt presenters" and the aforementioned Sport mode that illuminates a red ring around the gauges red when engaged. Properly positioning the front seats, I was able to fit comfortably in the rear seat of the Cascada, but I'd hate to go on a lengthy road trip from back there.In terms of its styling, the Cascada is very well proportioned with an infusion of styling cues borrowed from the Astra and Insignia, and it even has a good profile with the top up. Giving the car an upscale appearance, this car featured a burgundy-on-burgundy color combination and optional 19-inch wheels. One element of the car's design that will be interesting to see after US safety regulations are accounted for is the decklid. Like the Insignia wagon (and the Audi Q7), the Cascada's wraparound decklid means that when the trunk is open, the entirety of the taillights go along with it. As a fix to this, there are supplemental taillights mounted inside the trunk that illuminate to ensure there is some rearward lighting when the trunk is open.The Cascada rides on GM's Delta II platform, which underpins the Verano, so it would make sense if this car ends up being named the Verano Convertible. On the other hand, this might be a good time to bring back a classic Buick name like, perhaps, Riviera (though that name was recently used on the Shanghai-shown concept). Not that this would play into the Cascada's pricing in the US, but in Germany, it carries a price of 25,945 euros (around $35,000 USD) with this loaded tester topping out at around 34,000 euros ($45,800) including VAT.Though my time with the Cascada was limited, it was enough to realize that this car could be a hit for US buyers. In a worst case scenario – if GM just slaps some Buick badges and fender portholes on the Cascada leaving the powertrain as is – Buick will at least have a competent convertible to rival the Chrysler 200 and Volkswagen Eos, but done right, this car could potentially put some heat on front-drive-based luxury convertibles like the Audi A5.Engine:Turbo 1.6L I4Power:170 HP / 207 LB-FTTransmission:6-Speed Manual0-60 Time:9.6 Seconds (0-62)Top Speed:137 MPHDrivetrain:Front-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:3,820 LBSSeating:2+2Cargo:9.9 / 13.4 CU-FTMPG:6.3 L/100km (combined)Base Price:25,945 (euros)As-Tested Price:34,000 (euros)Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2014 Ram 1500 Diesel

 

Remember when Mahindra & Mahindra was close to offering a compact diesel pickup here? A million voices from the truck-and-bed-loving tribes of the Internet cried out at once in anticipation, only to be silenced in disappointment when it didn't happen. And this was for a jitney with a bed that didn't exactly look robust in its press photos. The message these fans had was clear: light-duty truck + a diesel engine = a prayer answered for a significant contingent of truck buyers.


Ram tells us a fullsize diesel half-ton has been the number-one demand from customers, and it will be the first manufacturer to grand the wish when the 2014 Ram 1500 goes on sale early next year – "late availability" in Q1 of 2014 is the official word – with a 3.0-liter, six-cylinder turbodiesel provided by VM Motori. If you're wondering about the engine source, VM Motori has been a Chrysler supplier since 1992. DaimlerChrysler bought VM Motori in 2000, and after a few ownership-stake changes since then, it is presently a 50-50 joint venture between General Motors and Fiat. That will change shortly, however, with Fiat recently announcing it will buy GM's share and take full control of the company.


Driving Notes The 3.0-liter diesel puts out 240 horsepower at 3,600 rpm and 420 pound-feet of torque at 2,000 rpm, and will be paired with the company's TorqueFlite eight-speed transmission. Fuel economy hasn't been announced yet, but we have been told to expect something in "the upper twenties." Ram's David Elshoff said, "We know for sure it's higher than 25 miles per gallon, so 26 or higher will be the commitment." During a press conference at the Texas State Fair today, Ram Trucks boss Reid Bigland announced that the truck's latest estimate is 27 mpg on the highway. The engine is compatible with B-20 biodiesel, as well.The 50-state compliant common-rail diesel weighs just 40 pounds more than the 5.7-liter Hemi V8 thanks to a cylinder block and bedplate of compacted graphite iron, along with aluminum pistons and heads and a structural aluminum oil pan. Other technologies in the new engine design include fast-acting high-temperature glow plugs, an electronically controlled variable-geometry water-cooled turbocharger, electronically controlled Exhaust Gas Recirculation system, a 10,000-mile oil-change interval and a front-end accessory drive.Compared the diesel's numbers to its brethren in the Ram stable: The 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 makes 305 hp at 6,400 rpm and 269 lb-ft at 4,175 rpm, returning 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway. The 5.7-liter Hemi V8 produces 395 hp at 5,600 rpm and 410 lb-ft at 3,950 rpm, and gets 15 mpg city, 22 mpg highway.In addition to slightly better mileage than the Pentastar V6 and lots more torque, the diesel will have an even bigger edge when it comes to fuel economy when towing, since gas mileage typically falls more quickly and dramatically than diesel mileage under load. The 3.0-liter diesel is rated to tow 9,200 pounds, the 3.6-liter V6 is rated at 7,450 pounds and the 5.7-liter V8 is rated at 10,400 pounds. We were told that when it comes to towing, the diesel is perfect for "Ski boats, midsize campers, snowmobiles. It's 90-percent of the Hemi with a night and day difference in fuel economy." During our day of driving, there was a diesel demo unit hooked up to a 4,500-pound ski boat/trailer combo, but a brake issue that developed on the trailer midway through the day meant we didn't get a chance to drive it.Ram said that it expects the 5.7-liter to remain its major seller, but it figures around 15 percent of the model 1500's mix will be diesel. For buyers choosing between Ram engines – as opposed to conquest customers walking in just for the diesel option – Elshoff said, "The diesel will take from the 5.7."The diesel will come with a price premium of $2,850 over a "similarly equipped" 5.7-liter Hemi and cost $4,500 more than 3.6-liter V6. At today's fuel prices, Ram expects diesel buyers to recover that $2,850 in less than three years, which is less than the 4.5-year average that buyers hold onto a truck. The new 1500 starts at $24,200 for the Pentastar V6, plus $1,095 destination. The Laramie Longhorn Edition Crew Cab 4x4 we drove had a base price of $48,730 and an as-tested price of $56,420.The diesel won't be offered on Sport models or the two-wheel-drive, regular cab, short-bed Tradesman. The ancillaries for the engine were designed with the long-wheelbase 1500 in mind, making the short wheelbase packaging too compact.Even though diesel 1500s will wear large "Ecodiesel" badges on their flanks, the option won't be pitched as 'green' to truck buyers. Pickup buyers have made it known that fuel economy combined with capability is a big deal, but the green they're concerned about is in their wallets. Still, that's how you get national ad campaigns in which Ram touts the best V6 fuel economy, General Motors touts the best V8 fuel economy and Ford promotes the best combo of towing and fuel economy with its EcoBoost V6.The closeness of the Chrysler/VM Motori relationship has allowed Ram to get its diesel to market more quickly than competitors – it is expected to hit retail outlets by the end of the year. This is important because Ram should have the market to itself until the Nissan Titan arrives next year with its Cummins 5.0-liter V8 diesel. However, when asked about the coming Titan diesel, one Ram rep asked, "Do you really consider a 5.0-liter a small diesel engine? We'll see how that works out."Behind the wheel, the diesel quickly shows itself to be a good engine. With more torque than the Hemi V8 combined with the capable eight-speed transmission, getting off the line quickly and accelerating from low speeds and rpm is not a problem. We took it through the same canyons used to test the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, and although it didn't display the same reflexes, it was still a fun drive, especially for a pickup. If you want more control, there are gear selector switches on the steering wheel. The 40-pound weight gain compared to the Hemi wasn't enough to change the feel of the front end. Understeer and wallow – beyond what you might experience in any pickup truck through mountain esses – wasn't really an issue.The engine is also refined. You have to stand next to it to hear the traditional, yet muted, diesel chatter. Standing in front and enduring the hot temperatures of our drive day, we could only hear the fans. From inside the cabin – even while accelerating – the engine barely sounds like a diesel. Stopped at light, it doesn't rock noticeably from side-to-side, a feat achieved without balance shafts.Since 2013 was the big redesign year, no other significant changes have been made for 2014. After a year on the market, no changes stick out as needed. The cabin is large, the seats are comfy, there's good-feeling materials everywhere, the Uconnect screen is large and a little busy, but easy to use. The new model year will offer a capless fuel filler as standard, an optional front park assist system and two new exterior colors: Blue Streak and Granite Crystal.On a side note, the first Dodge Ram truck with a Cummins engine was at the event, the initial engineering prototype Cummins built after approaching Dodge about an engine tie-up. The 1985 Dodge Ram 350 Royal SE sounded every bit as heavy duty as the 2014 Ram 2500 we parked next to it, but was about one-third the size. That original 5.9-liter inline six-cylinder had 146 hp, 400 lb-ft and redlined at about 2,500 rpm. The 6.7-liter Cummins in the current Ram achieves 385 hp and 850 lb-ft.Engine:3.0L V6 DIESELPower:240 HP / 420 LB-FTTransmission:8-Speed AutoDrivetrain:Four-Wheel DriveTowing:9,200 LBSSeating:2+3Base Price:$48,730As-Tested Price:$56,420Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2014 Dodge Durango [UPDATE]

2014 Dodge Durango

Say what you want about the Dodge Durango, but ever since it came on the scene in 1998, it has occupied its own niche in the SUV market – not too small, not too big, tough, able, not always the best on the road and not always the best off-road. If it were a football player, it would be a tight-end that can block and catch. If it were a hamburger – a double burger with cheese and bacon, but not the Whopper.

As part of a mid-cycle upgrade for what was already a very capable SUV that Chrysler introduced in 2011, and built on the same platform as the Mercedes GL-Class and Jeep Grand Cherokee, the 2014 Durango has gotten some refinements worth noting that have cleaned up its tailoring and toned up its body and powerplant. The result is an SUV that shows itself to be a very good value in a category full of sticker prices that can run away faster than a kid who's been told he has to take ballroom dancing lessons.

Chrysler executives showing us the new Durango made a special point to reiterate that the Dodge brand is not going away, as has been rumored after the company took the Ram and Viper – the cream of the brand – out from under the Dodge umbrella. Turns out Dodge has been the brand attracting the most young people (who knew?) and has a younger average age buyer than Honda. The Dodge brand historically has also attracted buyers who aren't exactly Phi-Beta Cappa, which some companies worry about. Chrysler not so much. Dodge buyers tend to be more the working, high-school-educated, community-college-educated backbone of the work force in America. If they keep coming to Dodge, the Durango is a pretty good piece of hardware to save up for.

Driving Notes Power management has been executed very nicely. The Durango comes with either the familiar 5.7-liter Hemi V8 or the standard 3.6-liter Pentastar V6. We tested both around the canyons around Los Angeles, which meant we had highway time, as well as taking it around the twisties. The verdict? If you are a suburban kid-hauler and soccer-team coach using the Durango in lieu of a minivan, then by all means opt for the more fuel efficient and perfectly adequate V6. If, on the other hand, you have stuff to pull – boats, trailers, etc., then it's Hemi time. The V6 produces 290 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque. The Hemi cranks 360 hp and 390 lb-ft.The fuel economy numbers are not official* for the Durango with the new eight-speed tranny, but the company says it results in a nine-percent hike. That will be an improvement over the following current numbers: a two-wheel-drive Durango is rated at 16/23 with the V6 and 14/20 with the V8. The all-wheel-drive setup knocks one percent off the V8's fuel economy, and doesn't impact the V6's mpg at all. Nice. By virtue of the improvement in fuel economy and size of the gas tank, Chrysler claims the Durango has the longest one-tank range of 600 miles in the category. Durango also has an Eco driving mode we tested and liked. That system fiddles with throttle sensitivity and cylinder-deactivation. The driver, though, can override that with the push of a button if it's not optimal for driving conditions or the vehicle's load.As mentioned, the Durango has been given Chrysler's new eight-speed automatic transmission. The new tranny works via the same sort of rotary knob as has been put into the Ram 1500 – a not-exactly-big innovation, but we are digging how it frees up real estate in the dash. It's a simple and elegant change that can become a signature of Ram and Dodge trucks and SUVs, and one we suspect rivals won't copy for fear of looking like followers.The exterior features a new grille look and taillights meant to elicit a racetrack aura that is defining Dodge's lamp design. We did not get a chance to try the towing package, but the specs say the the V6 will pull 6,200 pounds and the Hemi will tow 7,200 pounds.Chrysler has added to the Durango's trim levels menu by including a new "Limited" model to go along with the SXT, Rallye, R/T and Ted Turner-money top-o-the-line Citadel. The kit that comes with the Limited includes leather seats, heated seats and steering wheel, an 8.4-inch Uconnect screen and 18-inch wheels. Distinguishing the R/T and Rallye trims are a monochrome exterior, 20-inch black wheels, dual exhaust pipes and black accents around the headlights. LED running lights come standard on Rallye, Limited, R/T and Citadel, while R/T and Citadel get HID headlamps as well.In case you have missed it, every automaker is moving fast into "smart" systems to prevent collisions, pedestrian accidents and, if they could, your dog from peeing on the living room carpet when you're not home. Durango offers blind-spot monitoring, rear-cross-path alert that helps keep you from backing into a head-down texting driver or pedestrian, collision warning, crash mitigation that works the brakes better than many drivers can and driver's-side knee airbags.UConnect won AOL Autos' 2012 Technology of the Year Award for the upgraded system that was installed in the 2013 Ram 1500 and Viper. That system is in the Durango, with the added feature of a Yelp app that is pretty handy for finding what you want wherever you are. Taxidermy in LA? Yeah, it told us where to go. A new emergency-help button has been added as well. Entertainment screens have been moved into the seat-backs for backseat passengers, and out of the drop down position from the headliner in the old model.Because Chrysler sees Dodge as a "value brand," it has to price aggressively, and it is doing just that. The Durango's starting price is still $29,795, excluding destination. The Durango Limited starts at $35,995 (a bump of $800 over the 2013 Crew), while the R/T now starts at $38,995 (up $2,500). The Durango Citadel will start at $40,995 – an increase of $1,000. In true cheeky fashion, Dodge reps compared the price of the Citadel with a Mercedes GL that shares the same platform, has less equipment and costs more than $30K more if you get all the goodies on the GL that are on and in the Durango.UPDATE: Chrysler has provided official fuel economy numbers for the 2014 Durango: Rear-wheel drive V6 models achieve 18 miles per gallon city, 25 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined. All-wheel drive models loose one mpg on each cycle. RWD V8 models achieve 14 mpg city, 23 highway and 17 combined, while AWD models register 14 city, 22 highway and 16 combined. Engine:5.7L V8Power:360 HP / 390 LB-FTTransmission:8-Speed AutoDrivetrain:All-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:5,331 LBSTowing:7,200 LBSSeating:2+3+2Cargo:84.5 CU-FT (max)MPG:14 City / 22 HWYBase Price:$29,795Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2014 Ram ProMaster 2500

 

Front-wheel drive is what sets the all-new Ram ProMaster full-size commercial van apart from its competition. In a segment still choked with thirsty, rear-wheel-drive, ladder frame, pickup truck-based cargo vans, the American automaker is introducing something entirely new – well, new to our domestic market, as Europeans will recognize Ram's fresh entrant as a made-for-USA Fiat Ducato.


While the big ProMaster doesn't have a traditional body-on-frame chassis, it isn't a pure unibody either. Consider it a hybrid of both, with a unibody cab up front and a reinforced high-strength steel subframe in the rear. The platform employs double A-arms and MacPherson struts on the front axle, while the rear uses a simple tubular beam axle. Tires are 225/75R16 at all four corners. The steering is hydraulic rack-and-pinion (allowing an impressive 36-foot turning radius) and there are disc brakes with two-piston calipers all around. It is a solid, if unsophisticated, setup.


This game-changing van, which has already arrived in showrooms with a starting price of $28,630, is propelled by either a gasoline-powered 3.6-liter Pentastar six-cylinder (280 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque) or a new turbocharged 3.0-liter four-cylinder diesel (174 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque). Ram will offer a traditional six-speed automatic or a new six-speed automated single-clutch manual transmission that drops the hydraulic linkage to improve fuel economy – details are still emerging on this unique gearbox.


Positioning the entire powertrain, including the fuel tank, in the nose of the truck means the cargo floor can be very low – Ram boasts it is just 21 inches off the pavement. Operators will be able to stuff 530 cubic feet of cargo into the cavernous ProMaster, with a maximum payload weight of 5,145 pounds (the gross combined weight rating is 11,500 pounds for 3.6-liter and 12,500 pounds for the 3.0-liter).


Driving Notes An initial walkaround of this Flame Red test vehicle (a 159-inch wheelbase, high-roof model) reveals a slew of commercial-friendly touches that improve convenience and help lower ownership costs. Easy-to-open sliding doors, both wide enough for pallets, are offered on each side. The cargo floor is available in several finishes (resin-finished wood, painted steel or rubber-coated steel) and there are up to 17 fold-away tie-down rings and an available cargo partition to keep loads secure. At the front of the cargo hold, directly above the cab, is a 'Mom's Attic' for additional storage.The headlights are mounted high on the nose to limit fended-bender damage, and the bumpers are multi-piece so repairing marred sections won't require a complete replacement. It's a thoughtful series of touches that makes for an awkward-looking front end.The driving position is commanding and very truck-like, meaning you sit up straight and lean forward toward the steering wheel. All of the controls are logically located, self-explanatory (manual fan speed, temperature control and distribution) and convenient to reach without stretching. With the seat all the way rearward (I'm six-foot, two-inches tall), the high-mounted shoulder belts fit awkwardly due to the relationship of the B-pillar – not as snugly as I like. Nevertheless, the view outward is excellent, and the large side mirrors and backup camera simplify low-speed maneuvers in forward and reverse.It's hard to fault the on-road driving dynamics, especially compared to the others in the segment. The ProMaster drives like a big minivan – not a truck – which is a nice compliment. The front wheels are doing all of the work, and they have plenty of weight over them (even when empty), meaning the Ram feels stable and in contact with the road at all times. The steering is a bit slow, as expected, but the van is surprisingly agile and it doesn't feel top-heavy even when rushed around a few canyons.I am a huge fan of the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter, the ProMaster's most obvious competitor. Comparing the two, the Sprinter is more truck-like, while the Ram drives like a car-based van. The Sprinter is also slightly narrower, improving agility through traffic, but the Ram's width means more overall stability, which I found reassuring. While it likely won't pull many Gs on a skidpad (not that it matters a lot in the cargo-lugging universe), I'm going out on a limb and say the ProMaster is actually fun to drive.Ram will offer its Mexican-assembled ProMaster in 14 different configurations, mixing and matching chassis (1500, 2500 and 3500), wheelbase (118-inch, 136-inch and 159-inch), roof (low or high) and body (cargo van, chassis cab, cutaway and window van). Unsurprisingly, the automaker has identified six competitors it plans to take on – Chevrolet Express, Ford E-Series, Ford Transit, GMC Savanna, Nissan NV Cargo and aforementioned Mercedes-Benz Sprinter. It'll take some full-load testing and long-term durability reports to know more, but I'd say they all have some serious worrying to do.Engine:3.6L V6Power:280 HP / 258 LB-FTTransmission:6-Speed AutoDrivetrain:Front-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:4,600 LBS (est.)Towing:5,100 LBSSeating:2Base Price:$32,875As-Tested Price:$37,175Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here

2013 Shelby Raptor

 

We're big fans of the Ford F-150 SVT Raptor, a full-size pickup impressively configured from the factory for serious desert running. While its stock, naturally aspirated 6.2-liter V8 provides 411 horsepower, some consider it lacking. Others still want more aggressive underpinnings for even more serious duty. Stop worrying, as Shelby American appears to have the answer with its new Shelby Raptor.


While the Las Vegas-based company offers nearly all of its upgrades on its à la carte menu (good for those on a budget), the test truck seen here arrived loaded with just about everything.


To begin the transformation, a 2.9-liter Whipple supercharger and intercooler are bolted to the V8, followed by a Shelby Stinger exhaust system to improve the engine's breathing. The upgrades bump output by 164 horsepower, meaning the truck goes from 'impressive' to 'seriously quick' on the acceleration scale. But the company doesn't stop there, as the suspension has been upgraded with Shelby 3-inch shocks, new upper and lower control arms and a new frame kit with bump stops. In addition to a new skid plate package for protection, the stock wheels have been replaced with 18x9 Shelby Method alloys wearing aggressive 35-inch BFG Mud-Terrain T/A tires (35x12.50R18LT) for go-anywhere capabilities.


Cosmetically speaking, the interior is upgraded with a custom Shelby leather package and additional gauges have been added to allow the driver to keep a closer eye on things. The exterior doesn't escape the treatment, either, as it receives new bumpers, a full chase rack and plenty of graphics. And, of course, there is the obligatory unique Shelby serial number plate on the blown engine and one for everyone to see prominently on the dashboard.


We recently spent an afternoon criss-crossing the LA Basin with this massive truck, putting in a few soft-roading miles for our photoshoot. To really do the Shelby justice and properly explore its capabilities, however, we really need to spend more time doing what it genuinely wants to do. That is, launching it off tall berms, crossing deep streams and bashing over rocks. Unfortunately, the opportunity didn't present itself. Next time.


Driving Notes: One glance at our loaded silver and blue test truck reveals a ridiculous amount of 'Shelby' branding. Laughable levels, actually. Shelby's name is plastered on the seats, dash, quarter panels, doors and tailgate. It appears four times on the rear bumper alone! Enough already – it's overkill to a nauseating level (the company reportedly offers packages that are much more discreet). And don't get us started on the overuse of LED light bars.Nearly all of the upgrades are actually functional for desert running and rock-crawling, with the exception of one; the silly placement of aftermarket gauges in the middle of the dashboard vents. The analog boost and fuel pressure dials are not only ergonomically incorrect (nobody looks to the HVAC vents for information), their 'plug' design blocks critical airflow from the vents themselves. We prefer to see them mounted on the A-pillar, like everyone else does, to make them easy to read and keep them out of the way. Speaking of visibility, if you opt for the bed-mounted spare, don't bother looking in the rearview mirror, as the backside of the tire completely fills the glass.Stepping on the accelerator pedal sets a chain of events in motion. Within a fraction of a second, the supercharger begins to wail from under the hood, a noise that's followed by an immediate burst of power that rips the tires' tread blocks from the pavement. The process is neighborhood-waking loud, and the modified Ford takes off at a rate that is completely unexpected considering its obscene curb weight - most estimates say the 6,200-pound pickup will hit 60 mph in the mid-five second range. Fuel economy is predictably miserable, and owners should consider themselves fortunate if they make it into the double-digits (if by some circumstance they do, they aren't driving the Shelby properly).Our test truck appears to have been tuned purely for off-road enjoyment, meaning its on-pavement driving characteristics are crude, at best. The generous suspension travel, low steering rate, high center of gravity, curb weight and huge tire tread blocks means the Shelby squirms and rolls around corners with an annoying delay to steering inputs. Yet if we had the ability to take this Raptor into the dirt, mud, rocks or snow, all of these qualities would have helped to make it one capable beast of a machine.If driving a monster truck on public roads is what you are seeking, Shelby has your answer with its tuned Raptor. However, unless you plan on tackling serious trails, we'd lay off the suspension and wheel upgrades, as they destroy the on-road manners of the factory Raptor – qualities most drivers will grow to appreciate.Engine:Supercharged 6.2L V8Power:575 HPTransmission:6-Speed Auto0-60 Time:5.5 Seconds (est.)Drivetrain:Four-Wheel DriveCurb Weight:6,200 LBS (est.)Seating:2+3MPG:11 City / 18 HWYAs-Tested Price:$89,088Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.

Sign up for Autoblog's newsletter and get today's news delivered straight to your inbox.


View the original article here