Showing posts with label Spark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spark. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Gene Patents Spark Debate in High Court

Register Today

Earn Free CME Credits by reading the latest medical news in your specialty.

Sign Up
By David Pittman, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today

WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court justices lobbed hard questions Monday about whether a company could patent isolated human genes in a case that looms large in the personalized medicine arena.

During arguments before the court, several justices expressed doubt that Myriad Genetics could rightfully patent segments of human genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, genes in which mutations are indications of increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Products of nature aren't patentable. Only inventions are, but Salt Lake City-based Myriad argued that because the genes have been isolated from the body, they are no longer a product of nature and can be patented.

"Now, yes, you can have a patent on the process of extracting that small part, but I don't understand how a small part of something bigger isn't obvious," Chief Justice John Roberts said.

Meanwhile, Myriad can stop others from making, using, selling, and offering to sell genetic testing to determine if an individual has such a genetic mutation.

A number of organizations including those led by physicians, researchers, clinicians, and other health professions were initially involved in the case.

"There might be a million things you can do with the BRCA genes, but nobody but Myriad is allowed to look at it and that's impeding science rather than advancing it," Christopher Hansen, who argued against Myriad, said.

A district court in 2010 ruled the patents invalid because they were products of nature. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 2011 disagreed, setting up the case for the Supreme Court.

The Federal Circuit likened Myriad's case to that of a baseball bat. A tree isn't patent eligible, but a bat -- once extracted from the tree and carved -- is eligible.

Roberts disagreed with that analogy. "The baseball bat is quite different," Roberts said. "You don't look at a tree and say, 'well, I've cut the branch here and cut it here and all of a sudden I've got a baseball bat.' You have to invent it, if you will."

Justices repeatedly turned to the analogy of extracting a molecule from a tree leaf that is known for medicinal use. The leaf itself is a product of nature and not patentable, but the extracted molecule may be, Justice Samuel Alito said, seeming to support Myriad.

"The isolated DNA has a very different function than the DNA as it exists in your body," he added, just like the extracted molecule and the leaf. "And although the chemical composition may not be different, it certainly is in a different form."

Justice Sonia Sotomayor took a different tact and said the genes might be obvious -- not novel -- and therefore not patentable, which is a different argument from saying the genes are found in nature and not patent eligible.

Justice Stephen Breyer said he supported allowing companies like Myriad to be able to patent the process by which they find and extract certain gene segments -- just not genes themselves.

"It's important to keep products of nature free of the restrictions that patents there are," Breyer said.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued thousand of patents similar to that of Myriad's BRCA1 and BRCA2 and the company argued that a ruling against it could mean less investment in the field if they and others can't protect their work -- an argument justices questioned.

"What does Myriad get out of this deal? Why shouldn't we worry that Myriad or companies like it will just say, well, you know, we're not going to do this work anymore?" Justice Elena Kagan asked.

The High Court could rule in the case -- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics -- before its current term ends in late June.

David Pittman

David Pittman is MedPage Today’s Washington Correspondent, following the intersection of policy and healthcare. He covers Congress, FDA, and other health agencies in Washington, as well as major healthcare events. David holds bachelors’ degrees in journalism and chemistry from the University of Georgia and previously worked at the Amarillo Globe-News in Texas, Chemical & Engineering News and most recently FDAnews.

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with Facebook

Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with FacebookGet the lowest prices anywhere on Macs and iPads with exclusive coupons: Apple Price Guide updated May 25th. (Get the lowest prices anywhere) AppleInsiderHomeReviewsBackpagePrice GuidesNew MacsMacs with AppleCarePrevious MacsiPadsApple Wireless DevicesBid on New & Used Apple ProductsFollow UsTwitterFacebookGoogle+RSS Feeds & QriusiPhone AppTip UsSend us a tiptip us anonymouslyContact us by e-mailForumsAAPL: 445.15 ( +3.01 )Never miss an update Follow AppleInsiderFollow @AppleInsiderRSS –A+
Thursday, May 23, 2013, 08:48 pm

Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with FacebookBy AppleInsider Staff

According to Bloomberg sources, Google is looking to throw in a $1 billion bid for Waze, possibly portending a bidding war between the search giant and Facebook, which is also rumored to be eyeing an acquisition of the social mapping service.

People familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that Waze is managing "expressions of interest" from multiple parties, and is targeting a selling price of at least $1 billion. Alternatively, the firm may seek venture capital financing in order to stay independent.

Waze
A report earlier in May claimed Facebook was in talks to pick up Waze, with the purchase positioning the social network to enter an already cramped market led by Google Maps. Facebook's bid was also said to be around $1 billion.

The sources went on to say that Google only approached Waze after chatter of the Facebook bid went public, suggesting the tech monolith is looking to block Facebook from entering the mapping game.

The publication notes that a deal is far from being reached, and talks may fall apart as Waze's user base is substantial enough to raise funding privately. As of April, Waze had over 40 million people using its service.

In January, Apple too was rumored to be interested in purchasing the startup to bolster its iOS Maps app, but the claims turned out to be false. Sources on Thursday confirmed the Cupertino, Calif., company is not currently part of the talks.

As for Waze's existing investors, the company managed to successfully raise $30 million in a 2011 funding round led by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Horizons Ventures Hong Kong. Microsoft is also said to be an investor, as is Magma Venture Partners, Vertex Venture Capital and BlueRun Ventures.

The iOS app is free to download from the App Store, and features TomTom-like functionality like automatic reporting of traffic data. Social aspects include community-generated real-time routing, live maps and an accident reporting system, among others standard navigation features.Tags:GoogleFacebookMapsWazeJump to comments (39)Categories:General(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));Tweet!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); On Topic: GeneralFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dipReview: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQWorking Apple I fetches $671,400 in German auctionGoogle's Motorola issues second appeal of dismissed ITC case against AppleSouth Australia's first Apple Store draws line hours ahead of opening [update: photos and video]Today's' HeadlinesFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dipApple's iPhone sales tactics in Europe under antitrust investigationRelated ArticlesFacebook reportedly in talks to buy social mapping service WazeApple may acquire crowd-sourced traffic and navigation service WazeApple-Waze social mapping acquisition 'not happening'Apple and Google reportedly partners in $500M bid for Kodak patentsApple Maps directions beat Google Maps, Waze in pundit's head-to-head testPrevious Comments View Allhill602013/05/23 08:57pm

...but, but, but Google maps are already perfect.

?

Why would they need to buy another mapping company?

realwarder2013/05/23 09:23pm

Quote:Originally Posted by hill60?View Post

...but, but, but Google maps are already perfect.

?

Why would they need to buy another mapping company?


I was thinking similar.? Not that Google maps was perfect, but what was the point of them buying something else?

buckalec2013/05/23 09:25pm

heavy rain in NYC ?today - roads and flooding everywhere, did a control at 5:56pm ET (so sick of the google PR spin map spin machine and sad pathetic "journalists"?) and saved to photos. Once again, since the beginning, I used Apple Maps to get me home. Clean & simple. Tufte would be proud.

?

?

desuserign2013/05/23 09:35pm

Typical of Google &/or Facebook to spend a billion for something worth orders of magnitude less.

Remember Motorola?

theunfetteredmind2013/05/23 09:46pm

Quote:Originally Posted by realwarder?View Post


I was thinking similar.? Not that Google maps was perfect, but what was the point of them buying something else?

Agree. What would Waze have that they (1) want and (2) are willing to pay that much to get? They would have to know Apple isn't interested at that price point and I can't imagine it would be just to keep it out of Facebook's hands? Are they really a threat? What even would Facebook do with them?

mstone2013/05/23 09:49pm

Quote:Originally Posted by TheUnfetteredMind?View Post

Quote:Originally Posted by realwarder?View Post


I was thinking similar.? Not that Google maps was perfect, but what was the point of them buying something else?

Agree. What would Waze have that they (1) want and (2) are willing to pay that much to get? They would have to know Apple isn't interested at that price point and I can't imagine it would be just to keep it out of Facebook's hands? Are they really a threat? What even would Facebook do with them?

Simple Google wants to keep it out of the hands of anyone else as it could rival their own offerings. Purely defensive.

jungmark2013/05/23 09:58pm

Google, Don't make me have to uninstall Waze!

jivanile2013/05/23 10:01pm

Does anyone else think the "but, but, but" thing needs to stop. ?It seems to come up at least once in every thread, sometimes more. ?It's overplayed so please stop.

slurpy2013/05/23 10:14pm

I think Apple needs this, or foursquare.
Buying foursquare would be amazing.

jsmythe002013/05/23 10:20pm

side bar: what i think apple needs to do is buy a carrier. or bandwidth and have mobile services thats caters specifically to ios

View all commentsLogin to Comment

Have an opinion? Sign Up to share it.


Latest Apple Headlinesarticle_thumbFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dip~2 hours agoarticle_thumbApple's iPhone sales tactics in Europe under antitrust investigation~2 hours agoarticle_thumbReview: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQ~16 hours agoarticle_thumbCradle attachment turns Apple's iPhone into handheld biosensor~16 hours agoarticle_thumbWorking Apple I fetches $671,400 in German auction~17 hours agomore...

Apply to AppleInsiderWant to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now! Lowest Prices Anywhere!Price guideModelPriceYou Save Core i5 MacBook Pros w/ Retina 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/128GB $1,406.48 $292.52 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/256GB $1,479.99 $519.01 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/512GB $1,699.99 $799.01 Core i7 MacBook Pros w/ Retina 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/256GB $1,599.99 $599.01 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/512GB $1,799.99 $899.01 15" 2.3GHz/8GB/256GB $1,899.99 $299.01 15" 2.6GHz/8GB/512GB $2,299.99 $568.01 15" 2.7GHz/16GB/768GB $2,699.99 $499.01 More configurations
Active Forum Topics

147

Editorial: Apple's iOS 7 needs exclusive, distinctive features, not just a flat UI

25

iPad shipments could see first ever year-on-year decline in Q2, analyst says

11

Cook: US-built Mac will be refreshed version of existing product

10

2013 Mac mini Wishlist/iMac wishlist

8

ISLAM WATCHmore... Price guide Model WhiteBlack iPad mini (WiFi only) 16GB WiFi WiFi$329.99$329.99 32GB WiFi WiFi $429.99 $429.99 64GB WiFi WiFi $529.99 $529.99 iPad mini (WiFi + 4G)   AT&T Verizon Sprint 16GB 4G White $459.99 $459.99 $459.99 32GB 4G White $559.99 $559.99 $559.99 64GB 4G White $659.99 $659.99 $659.99 16GB 4G Black $459.99 $459.99 $459.99 32GB 4G Black $559.99 $559.99 $559.99 64GB 4G Black $659.99 $659.99 $659.99 See more iPad models in our Price GuidesReviewsHot TopicsGeneraliPhoneTaxesiOSGoogleiPadpatentsappsTim CookApp StoreAndroidlawsuitsMapsApple StoreAT&T
Top of pageCopyright ? 2013, AppleInsider.com, Contact UsPrivacy PolicyAdvertise on AppleInsiderDesign: gesamtbild

View the original article here

Thursday, 9 May 2013

O's Finally Get Offensive Spark in Yesterdays Lost

Eric Byrnes was traded to the O's for Larry Bigbie on Friday. Byrnes was in the 2 hole for the Orioles line-up on Saturday. Even though the Orioles lost another heartbreaker( haven't they all been), Byrnes was an immediate impact in the 4th inning by plating Brian Roberts in the 4 run inning. He went 1-5 in the game with a RBI.

But the O's couldn't stop their woes in the losing department, their relief pitching fell apart yet again. Now it is Chris Ray who is the new struggling pitcher. Going into Thursday against Texas in which the O's lost the game 2-1 because of a homer against Ray, he had an ERA under 1.00. Ray has now given up 4 runs in 2 games, three of which was yesterday.

The Orioles should have had plenty of offense with a 6-4 lead going into the 8th inning, but they couldn't finish the game off. Nothing is going their way. When the O's have good pitching, the batters can't hit. When they have the run support, the pitching lets the team down. On of these days, they will figure it out. Hopefully.

One last note: For the first time since April 7th when they were 1-2, the Orioles are under .500 and now 7 games out of first place.

Posted by helimech24 at July 31, 2005 08:33 AM | TrackBack

View the original article here