Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Monday, 20 January 2014

Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service - Class Review

Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service - Class Review Register Help Remember Me? TechExams.net IT Certification Forums WGU What's New Today's Posts Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Advanced Search Forum Others LPI, RHCE, and SAIR Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service - Class Review + Reply to Thread Results 1 to 5 of 5 Thread: Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service - Class Review Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… chanakyajupudi chanakyajupudi is online now Senior Member Join Date Apr 2013 Location Hyderabad , India Posts 446
Certifications MCP, MCTS , MCSA - Windows Server 2012 , MCSE - Server Infrastructure, RHCSA , RHCE, RHCVA, CoE 423 , CoE 429, CCSP, GCIH, GSEC , ITIL-F, VCA-DCV 01-11-2014 01:36 PM #1 Default Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service - Class Review
I just enrolled in the Red Hat Certificate of Expertise in Infrastructure-as-a-Service class and am done with Day 1.

The course is based on the Grizzly version of Openstack renamed to Redhat Openstack ( Similar to RDO ).

Its a 3 day course. Day 1 including the definitions of Openstack and the various services it binds within itself. Redhat has done a good job by introducing a management or ease of installation tool called Packstack which makes it easy to install and customize.

Command line begins tomorrow. Today was just installation of the OpenStack Platform , setting up the network , storage , allocating Floating IP Addresses and finally firing up an instance.

I have always been a fan of OpenStack and this course I expect to be able to build a test environment and try using this as a solution next time I get a chance.

More to come !

Course the way I see it is not very difficult and I hope the exam is not too difficult either. Course ends on the 14th and the exam is scheduled on the 21st.

I also have the GIAC Security Essentials paper on the 17th which is now going to be cumbersome as I have also started the VMware VCP Class from Stanley CC which starts on the 15th !

Busy week and a very busy month ahead !

Any queries about the course and I would be gladly respond ! Get in touch !

Cheers

Chanakya
Work In Progress - GCFE [ ] GCIA [ ] GPEN [ ] VCP DCV [ ] ACE [ ]
LinkedIn : http://in.linkedin.com/in/jcadarsh/
Check out my Blog : http://adarsh.jupudi.in

Reply With Quote Quote  
Login/register to remove this advertisement. brombulec brombulec is offline Junior Member Join Date May 2013 Posts 20
Certifications RHCT, RHCE, RHCVA, HP-UX CSA, MCTS (x11), MCSE: Private Cloud, MCSA (x6) MCITP (x5),JNCIA, CCNA R&S/SEC 01-14-2014 07:11 PM #2
Hi Adarsh
Could you post the course Table Of Contents?

Good luck on your exams.

--
Regards
Piotr
Reply With Quote Quote   chanakyajupudi chanakyajupudi is online now Senior Member Join Date Apr 2013 Location Hyderabad , India Posts 446
Certifications MCP, MCTS , MCSA - Windows Server 2012 , MCSE - Server Infrastructure, RHCSA , RHCE, RHCVA, CoE 423 , CoE 429, CCSP, GCIH, GSEC , ITIL-F, VCA-DCV 01-16-2014 07:30 AM #3
Day 2 & Day 3

These days were doing what we did on Day1

Day 1 uses packstack as a package to install and configure basic functions of OpenStack.

Day 2 and Day 3 individually configures each of the 9 services of Opensack via command line and also shows various functions via command line.

Exam scheduled on the 21st !

Cheers
Work In Progress - GCFE [ ] GCIA [ ] GPEN [ ] VCP DCV [ ] ACE [ ]
LinkedIn : http://in.linkedin.com/in/jcadarsh/
Check out my Blog : http://adarsh.jupudi.in

Reply With Quote Quote   chanakyajupudi chanakyajupudi is online now Senior Member Join Date Apr 2013 Location Hyderabad , India Posts 446
Certifications MCP, MCTS , MCSA - Windows Server 2012 , MCSE - Server Infrastructure, RHCSA , RHCE, RHCVA, CoE 423 , CoE 429, CCSP, GCIH, GSEC , ITIL-F, VCA-DCV 01-16-2014 07:33 AM #4
Table of Contents :

Redhat Openstack Architecture
Redhat Openstack Installation
Message Broker
Identity Service
Object Storage Service
Image Service
Block Storage Service
Networking Service
Compute and Controller Services
Additional Computer Node
Orchestration Service
Metering Service
Future Direction of Redhat Openstack
Comprehensive Review
Work In Progress - GCFE [ ] GCIA [ ] GPEN [ ] VCP DCV [ ] ACE [ ]
LinkedIn : http://in.linkedin.com/in/jcadarsh/
Check out my Blog : http://adarsh.jupudi.in

Reply With Quote Quote   brombulec brombulec is offline Junior Member Join Date May 2013 Posts 20
Certifications RHCT, RHCE, RHCVA, HP-UX CSA, MCTS (x11), MCSE: Private Cloud, MCSA (x6) MCITP (x5),JNCIA, CCNA R&S/SEC 01-16-2014 12:57 PM #5
Thank you very much.

--
Regards
Piotr
Reply With Quote Quote   + Reply to Thread « Previous Thread|Next Thread »
Social Networking & Bookmarks Bookmarks Submit to Digg Digg Submit to del.icio.us del.icio.us Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Submit to Google Google Tweet CompTIA Cisco Microsoft CWNP InfoSec Practice Exams Forums Blogs

Subnet Calculator Netpict Online Degrees Exam Vouchers Free Magazines Topsites
Certification Kits
Home Forum Rules Contact UsSupport Us Archive Privacy Statement Top TechExams.net ? 2002 - 2013 - All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM. - CSS version TechExams.Net is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco®, Cisco Systems®, CCDA?, CCNA?, CCDP?, CCNP?, CCIE?, CCSI?; the Cisco Systems logo and the CCIE logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. in the United States and certain other countries. All other trademarks, including those of Microsoft, CompTIA, Juniper ISC(2), and CWNP are trademarks of their respective owners.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

View the original article here

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Small Review of RHCE Rapid course, and what's next after RHCE?

Hi,

I recently attended the RHCE Rapid Course. I have a small review for everyone here. First like to let everyone know, I have 10+ years in writing c/c++ professionally. The biggest leap I made, if i treated RHEL like a programming environment, everything clicks.

1) Redhat's course is top shelf. Is it worth the money? If you have it, yes.

2) The redhat instructor is A+++. The instructor explained things very elegantly. He is from Canada, but I can't seem to recall his name.

3) Its very fast paced and 95% hands on.

4) The RHCE Rapid book is great, its direct to the point. I wish they had this on PDF.

5) Everything builds on everything. You are constantly build skill by executing things over and over in different scenarios.

How did we do collectively?

1) Majority passed the RHCSA exam, some unfortunately, did not. Most for the same reason, unfortunately, I can not tell why

2) Even fewer passed the RHCE exam. Most ran out of time. I did too, but it was on when I was checking my work. I am glad I did, i found a blatant issue that takes 2 seconds to fix.

I did pass, RHCSA with a perfect score, and RHCE with lots of wiggle room. To be blunt, I had it planned out that I would fail the first attempts and have this month and part of next to re-take it.

So my main question is what is next? I do not have a clear plan what to do next. I spent this weekend thinking on it and researching. I see I do need a good virtualization cert, like VMWare or RHVA (?). I like to take a huge step away from microsoft windows. So let me know what your thoughts are, and maybe I can come up with a plan in a few days.

Warm Regards


View the original article here

Saturday, 1 June 2013

Mac App Store Submission Tip: Do not submit demos, trials, or betas for Mac App Store Review

iOS submissions reviewed in the last 5 business days:

99%

New Apps

99%

App Updates

Last Updated: May 31, 2013


View the original article here

App Store Submission Tip: Preparing In App Purchase Items for App Review

iOS submissions reviewed in the last 5 business days:

99%

New Apps

99%

App Updates

Last Updated: May 31, 2013


View the original article here

Friday, 31 May 2013

Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 Review

Build and Design

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 sports black brushed metal casing that extends around the majority of the chassis. The metal casing employs a horizontal texture that serves to accentuate the slants and curves of the chassis' design. The dark protective metal contrasts beautifully against the bright red-backlit keyboard. The fierce and vibrant design is a staple of the gaming notebook, and Lenovo manages to capture that appeal with its cost-friendly Lenovo IdeaPad Y500. 


Measuring in at 15.2" x 10.2" x 1.4" and weighting just over 6 pounds the Lenovo Y500 is actually surprising slim for a gaming machine, especially for a device that incorporates Scalable Link Interface (SLI). It's not light, but users will have a hard time finding many gaming notebooks that are more portable than the Lenovo IdeaPad Y500. 

The metallic frame also offers a solid level of durability. The chassis proved to be extremity resistant completely withstanding applied pressure. The display case also tested well only giving slightly to pressure with no noticeable rippling occurring on screen. The Lenovo IdeaPad boasts impressive portability with the durability to take the wear and tear that travel incurs.

Ports and Features

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 offers a wide array of ports. The left side offers a VGA port, Ethernet port, an HDMI port, and two USB 3.0 ports. The right side offers separate mic and headphone jacks, and an always on USB 2.0 port.

The only serious issue with the ports is the placing of the two USB ports on the left-hand side of the machine. The two ports are congested making it difficult to access both ports simultaneously. Other than that everything is spaced adequately and easy to reach.

One of the key features of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 is its ultrabay, which is located on the right hand side of the chassis. The ultrabay allows users to customize the notebook by adding a number of different Lenovo components to the machine. The notebook that we tested came with a second (SLI-enabled) NVidia GT 650M GPU, but users could also include a HDD tray, cooling fan, or an optical DVD burner.

It's important to understand that only these Lenovo accessories are compatible with the ultrabay; other GPU cards or components will not work. While that makes the versatility of the bay rather limited, the ease of adding and removing components through the ultrabay is a welcomed addition. Changing the ultrabay component is relatively simple as well. Users simply need to shut down the device, remove the battery, unlock the bay, and then replace their ultrabay component. It's still not incredibly easy, but it's a great alternative to manually installing and removing components.

Display and Speakers

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 houses a 15.6" TFT color Vibrant View display with a 1920 x 1080 resolution. The display offers an incredibly clear image with a 500:1 color contrast. Both text and media reads great on the machine, and the games we tested looked beautiful on the glossy display. The one missing feature of the display is touch-capability, which would have been nice for Windows 8 functionality; but ultimately it's not a huge deal considering this is a gaming focused machine.

The display also offers extremely generous viewing angles. On the horizontal axis the display holds up well past 100 degrees with no noticeable distortion. The display fares just as well on the vertical axis with images remaining clear and crisp even at extreme angles. The only issue with the display is that the glossy surface sometimes causes background images to reflect on the display. Reflections are fairly limited though and only an issue in direct light.

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 houses a pair of RealTek HD speakers above the keyboard on the right and left side of the chassis. The speakers offer solid sound quality and robust amplification that can easily fill an entire room with audio. The boisterous speakers paired well with the games we tested, as the bass filled reverberations added another layer to the experience. While certainly powerful, the RealTek speakers struggle to capture the nuances of more subtle recordings. While playing an orchestral piece on the device, several distortions could be heard throughout. The faint hum wasn't too much of a deterrent, but it was certainly noticeable. Users who plan on playing games where ambient noise is important or want a high quality experience will want to use an external device.

Keyboard and TouchPad

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 offers a Chiclet style keyboard complete with number pad. The bright red back-lit keyboard clearly provides the aesthetic expected of a gaming device, but it also delivers the quality as well. The squared keys are braised on the top with an inward curved design providing additional friction and grip. Each key has solid compression with crisp tactile feedback allowing users to be secure in each stroke, making the keyboard perfect for typing. The lightning quick response and consistent performance ensure that the keyboard meets the lofty needs of gamers as well. Users looking for optimal performance may want to opt for a high-end external mechanical keyboard, though the built in keyboard offers more than sufficient quality.

The Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 offers a generously sized touchpad located directly below the spacebar of the keyboard. The touchpad is equipped with Synaptic drivers and devoid of buttons. Instead the pad designates the bottom left and right portion of the pad to act as mouse buttons, as denoted by a small graphic and slight downward slant of the pad. While the lack of buttons can be confusing, the slant of the pad along with the graphic allows users to know where the left and right click portions of the pad are located.

In terms of performance the pad is serviceable reading most clicks and swipes easily.  Multi-gestures read well, though there were a few instances where the touchpad failed to read input. There is a bit of friction on the pad that can make detailed functions (such as selecting a portion of text) a bit difficult; but as a gaming focused notebook, users will likely use an external mouse anyways.


View the original article here

Thursday, 30 May 2013

Review: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQ

Review: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQGet the lowest prices anywhere on Macs and iPads with exclusive coupons: Apple Price Guide updated May 25th. (Get the lowest prices anywhere) AppleInsiderHomeReviewsBackpagePrice GuidesNew MacsMacs with AppleCarePrevious MacsiPadsApple Wireless DevicesBid on New & Used Apple ProductsFollow UsTwitterFacebookGoogle+RSS Feeds & QriusiPhone AppTip UsSend us a tiptip us anonymouslyContact us by e-mailForumsAAPL: 445.15 ( +3.01 )Never miss an update Follow AppleInsiderFollow @AppleInsiderRSS –A+
Sunday, May 26, 2013, 07:10 pm

Review: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQBy Victor Marks

After decades in the car audio industry, and many years spent as a consumer device and accessory maker, Scosche recently debuted its first Bluetooth car stereo receiver in the controlFREQ, a single DIN head unit that can be controlled with smartphone app.

Scosche
The most important thing about car audio in this day of heavily integrated, manufacturer provided entertainment systems is paying attention to how integrated they are, and what you give up when you change to an aftermarket system.

Hardware

The first thing I noticed when using the controlFREQ was the immediately apparent lack of niceties from my old Cadillac receiver, which handled low fuel consumption, boasted steering wheel controls, integrated seat and mirror memory settings tied to the unlock key fob remotes, a trip computer, oil life and a number of other features I can't even recall.

I admit, these features are not crucial for driving, but having had them, it's as if I've given my car a lobotomy with the new unit, crippling its convenience.

Scosche
The controlFREQ has its benefits, but there are a few things that Scosche didn't get right. The receiver doesn't have a dedicated Siri button (or for Android, one that prompts the voice dial feature), lacks an external microphone and has no remote connector to translate commands from the car's steering wheel-mounted controls.

Why are these a big deal? Driving with Siri (or to a lesser extent, the automation found in Android or Windows Phone) is a great experience. Pressing a button to gain access to a phone's handsfree features is a perfect way to interact while on the road. It's not hard to do technically, and Scosche missed out on this feature.

Microphones need to be near the face to pick up voice well. In a car, this usually usually means installation around the rear view mirror, on the front pillar, or near the gauge binnacle. Anywhere that is close to, or in line with the driver's head. Locating the only microphone on the center stack means it isn't going to work as well as it could.

A component that would allow support for existing steering wheel control is an odd thing to exclude. This is especially confusing when Scosche already sells PAC-Audio devices which adapt car manufacturer's steering wheel controls to the remote interfaces on popular radios from Sony, Pioneer and JVC. The company also makes a wiring adapter with logic that allows from-the-factory parts, such as Bose Amps and GM's OnStar, to continue to work when an aftermarket stereo is installed.

Given this engineering capability and knowledge, why couldn't Scosche have included a remote interface in its first car stereo? If it had replicated any one of the remote signals already sold in one of the firm's other products, my steering wheel controls would still function.

Scosche
The controls that the receiver does have are well-executed. For example, the volume knob has a subtle click detent feel to it and turns with ease. It's large, knurled and easy to grab hold of. The screen is easy to read despite being segmented like old car stereos or alarm clocks, most likely a move to keep manufacturing prices down.

Installation

For the review, Scosche provided the following:
Scosche controlFREQ car stereo
Scosche GM1586B fascia (dual and single DIN) for my car, a 2005 Cadillac CTS
Scosche GM20SR Stereo Replacement Interface for 2003-2006 Cadillac SRX and CTS (retains Bose and OnStar)
The installation was relatively straight-forward, but there were some minor difficulties regarding compatibility.

Scosche
For example, the controlFREQ comes with a large sticker labeled "Warranty Void if Sticker Damaged or Removed."

Unfortunately, the act of inserting the Scosche radio in the provided fascia, using the company's ISO mounting tabs, will shred the sticker. You read correctly - installing the radio using parts from the same manufacturer causes damage that supposedly voids the warranty.

When made aware of the issue, Scosche noted that damage to the sticker during installation is usually not a problem, and the company would honor the warranty as long as the customer retains a copy of the purchase receipt.

Scosche
The Scosche GM1586B installation kit came with a single DIN surround and a dual DIN surround to make the gap around the radio follow the surface profile of the larger fascia - essentially a more "factory" look. The piece that comes stock on the controlFREQ doesn't.

When I switched the controlFREQ's fascia with that of the GM-specific part, a few of the very tiny snap fingers that hold it on (2 on each side) broke in the process. Using the nice one that comes with GM1586B prevents the radio faceplate from folding down or being easily removed - essentially blocking easy access to the reset button, SD Card slot and CD slot.

Scosche assures me that it's looking at redesigning this surround so that it can accommodate the the faceplate folding down.

Previous Page12Next PageJump to comments (7)Categories:General(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));Tweet!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); On Topic: GeneralFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dipReview: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQWorking Apple I fetches $671,400 in German auctionGoogle's Motorola issues second appeal of dismissed ITC case against AppleSouth Australia's first Apple Store draws line hours ahead of opening [update: photos and video]Today's' HeadlinesFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dipApple's iPhone sales tactics in Europe under antitrust investigationRelated ArticlesBMW confirms iPhone compatibility with handsfree callingFirst Look: 'auris' brings Bluetooth audio to legacy 30-pin docksApple plans Bluetooth iPod adapter, report claimsNew headphone, mic options for late 2008 iPodsApple's smart audio splitter lets multiple users view content on a single devicePrevious Comments View Allrobin huber2013/05/26 07:47pm

Would love to put this in my 2003 Subaru WRX, but the double-DIN stock unit includes a 6-disk CD changer that I'd have to give up. I'd be willing to sacrifice that for a single disk slot, but the review doesn't mention it including one. Maybe the next rev?

frxntier2013/05/26 10:55pm

Quote:Originally Posted by Robin Huber?

Would love to put this in my 2003 Subaru WRX, but the double-DIN stock unit includes a 6-disk CD changer that I'd have to give up. I'd be willing to sacrifice that for a single disk slot, but the review doesn't mention it including one. Maybe the next rev?
Why wouldn't you just load up a USB device with music, or stream via Bluetooth? CD's are just not worth the effort anymore.

Also, there are so many better head units available. The only 'good' thing about this one is the app. Which would be completely useless to me as I'd prefer to change tracks and volume on the head unit or with the steering wheel controls. An Alpine or Pioneer unit is much better for integration, even at this price.

I'm surprised something as boring as this is even on AI. Its one of the most basic head units I've ever seen.

michael scrip2013/05/27 12:17am

Wishing more headunits had REAR USB and AUX ports.

I hate having cords sticking out all the time...

cash9072013/05/27 01:37am

Quote:Originally Posted by Michael Scrip?

Wishing more headunits had REAR USB and AUX ports.

I hate having cords sticking out all the time...
My stock radio inside my 2011 F-150 has both, though they aren't attached by default. I ran a USB and mini-plug extension cable to my glove box where it connects to and old iPod classic. Out of sight, out of mind, but all of my music is a available at the touch of a button or simple voice command.

The trouble third party manufacturers are running into now, which is mentioned in this article, is just how integrated and feature packed the stock units on most modern vehicles are. I love Alpine amps and speakers, but there was no way I was going to give up the hands free control that Ford's Sync system gives me. Instead, I did what most people are doing these days, and ran a speaker level feed to an audio processor which kicks up sound quality to respectable levels, before passing it off to a solid amp and some decent speakers. The end result is superior sound, without sacrificing built in functionality or making my truck a target for thieves.

Until third party manufacturers like Alpine, Pioneer, Kenwood or Sony can roll out units that offer more features than the stock models instead of less, their market share will continue to decline. Gimmicky app-driven solutions like this are definitely not the answer.

philboogie2013/05/27 02:29am

Quote:Originally Posted by Robin Huber?

Would love to put this in my 2003 Subaru WRX, but the double-DIN stock unit includes a 6-disk CD changer that I'd have to give up. I'd be willing to sacrifice that for a single disk slot, but the review doesn't mention it including one. Maybe the next rev?
CD? That is sooo 1985.

davemcm762013/05/27 02:43am

I think I'll stick to my Sony S300BTX head unit with it's internal usb port iPod draw where the cd slot would normally be so my 80Gb classic can live quite happily tucked away inside it. Full Bluetooth support and an external USB let me charge or play music from my iPhone should I need to which make it near perfect for my needs...

redgeminipa2013/05/27 08:59am

Quote:Originally Posted by Robin Huber?View Post

Would love to put this in my 2003 Subaru WRX, but the double-DIN stock unit includes a 6-disk CD changer that I'd have to give up. I'd be willing to sacrifice that for a single disk slot, but the review doesn't mention it including one. Maybe the next rev?

If this will work for you, go get one. Even though CD isn't clearly mentioned, the one picture above clearly shows it, and this little sentence references it: "essentially blocking easy access to the reset button, SD Card slot and CD slot."

?

As for the 6-disc changer, I've quickly gotten over having one once I loaded?up my iPhone with music. I quickly learned it was so much more convenient, not to mention easier while driving, to have thousands of songs available at my fingertips. I can't remember the last time I played a CD in my car since I've gone to Bluetooth streaming with my iPhone.?

?

For now, it looks like I'm sticking with my JVC KW-AVX740. I'm still waiting for someone to make a decent Bluetooth audio/video head unit with iPhone 5 integration, with Lightening connector support and all.?

View all commentsLogin to Comment

Have an opinion? Sign Up to share it.


Latest Apple Headlinesarticle_thumbFoxconn may sell own branded accessories after Apple profits dip~2 hours agoarticle_thumbApple's iPhone sales tactics in Europe under antitrust investigation~2 hours agoarticle_thumbReview: Scosche enters car radio fray with iOS connected controlFREQ~15 hours agoarticle_thumbCradle attachment turns Apple's iPhone into handheld biosensor~16 hours agoarticle_thumbWorking Apple I fetches $671,400 in German auction~17 hours agomore...

Apply to AppleInsiderWant to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now! Lowest Prices Anywhere!Price guideModelPriceYou Save Core i5 MacBook Pros w/ Retina 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/128GB $1,406.48 $292.52 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/256GB $1,479.99 $519.01 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/512GB $1,699.99 $799.01 Core i7 MacBook Pros w/ Retina 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/256GB $1,599.99 $599.01 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/512GB $1,799.99 $899.01 15" 2.3GHz/8GB/256GB $1,899.99 $299.01 15" 2.6GHz/8GB/512GB $2,299.99 $568.01 15" 2.7GHz/16GB/768GB $2,699.99 $499.01 More configurations
Active Forum Topics

147

Editorial: Apple's iOS 7 needs exclusive, distinctive features, not just a flat UI

25

iPad shipments could see first ever year-on-year decline in Q2, analyst says

11

Cook: US-built Mac will be refreshed version of existing product

10

2013 Mac mini Wishlist/iMac wishlist

8

ISLAM WATCHmore... Price guide Model WhiteBlack iPad mini (WiFi only) 16GB WiFi WiFi$329.99$329.99 32GB WiFi WiFi $429.99 $429.99 64GB WiFi WiFi $529.99 $529.99 iPad mini (WiFi + 4G)   AT&T Verizon Sprint 16GB 4G White $459.99 $459.99 $459.99 32GB 4G White $559.99 $559.99 $559.99 64GB 4G White $659.99 $659.99 $659.99 16GB 4G Black $459.99 $459.99 $459.99 32GB 4G Black $559.99 $559.99 $559.99 64GB 4G Black $659.99 $659.99 $659.99 See more iPad models in our Price GuidesReviewsHot TopicsGeneraliPhoneTaxesiOSGoogleiPadpatentsappsTim CookApp StoreAndroidlawsuitsMapsApple StoreAT&T
Top of pageCopyright ? 2013, AppleInsider.com, Contact UsPrivacy PolicyAdvertise on AppleInsiderDesign: gesamtbild

View the original article here